Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38366159›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Neurophysiological signatures of mild traumatic brain injury in the acute and subacute phase.

Valentina Barone, Myrthe E de Koning, Harm J van der Horn, Joukje van der Naalt, Carin J Eertman-Meyer, Michel J A M van Putten

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valentina BaroneClinical Neurophysiology (CNPH), TechMedCenter, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands. v.barone@utwente.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0402-0052
Myrthe E de KoningDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Koningsplein 1, 7512 KZ, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Harm J van der HornDepartment of Neurology, University of Groningen, UniversityMedicalCenterGroningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Joukje van der NaaltDepartment of Neurology, University of Groningen, UniversityMedicalCenterGroningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Carin J Eertman-MeyerDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Koningsplein 1, 7512 KZ, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Michel J A M van PuttenClinical Neurophysiology (CNPH), TechMedCenter, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8319-3626
University Medical Center Groningen · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) affects 48 million people annually, with up to 30% experiencing long-term complaints such as fatigue, blurred vision, and poor concentration. Assessing neurophysiological features related to visual attention and outcome measures aids in understanding clinical symptoms and prognostication.

methodsWe recorded EEG and eye movements in mTBI patients during a computerized task performed in the acute (< 24 h, TBI-A) and subacute phase (4-6 weeks thereafter). We estimated the posterior dominant rhythm, reaction times (RTs), fixation duration, and event-related potentials (ERPs). Clinical outcome measures were assessed using the Head Injury Symptom Checklist (HISC) and the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) at 6 months post-injury. Similar analyses were performed in an age-matched control group (measured once). Linear mixed effect modeling was used to examine group differences and temporal changes within the mTBI group.

resultsTwenty-nine patients were included in the acute phase, 30 in the subacute phase, and 19 controls. RTs and fixation duration were longer in mTBI patients compared to controls (p < 0.05), but not between TBI-A and TBI-S (p < 0.05). The frequency of the posterior dominant rhythm was significantly slower in TBI-A (0.6 Hz, p < 0.05) than TBI-S. ERP mean amplitude was significantly lower in mTBI patients than in controls. Neurophysiological features did not significantly relate to clinical outcome measures.

conclusionmTBI patients demonstrate impaired processing speed and stimulus evaluation compared to controls, persisting up to 6 weeks after injury. Neurophysiological features in mTBI can assist in determining the extent and temporal progression of recovery.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsReaction TimeAdultAttentionEye MovementsFemaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultEEGERPEye trackingMild traumatic brain injuryVisual attention

Identifiers

PMID38366159
PMCPMC11176206
OpenAlexW4392782770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.