ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2024
Investigating Resilience Through Intrinsic Capacity Networks in Older Adults.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intrinsic capacity and mortality in community-dwelling octogenarians: a network analysis from the ilSIRENTE study.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Modelling healthy ageing in South Africa: a network analysis of intrinsic capacities.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- Challenges and opportunities of psychological aging research.European journal of ageing · 2025Review
- Resilience and Intrinsic Capacity in Older Adults: A Review of Recent Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The interplay between perceived fatigability, intrinsic capacity, and physical activity: network analysis in a British birth cohort study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025Article
- The vitality domain of intrinsic capacity: A scoping review of conceptual frameworks and measurements.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe network approach may provide a framework for understanding intrinsic capacity (IC) as a system's underlying functioning. The system's resilience to resist functional decline may arise from the interrelationships among system components, that is, body functions or capacities. We applied network analysis to investigate whether the interplay between different intrinsic capacities differs according to age and self-rated health (SRH) in older adults.
methodsThe study sample consisted of a population-based cohort of community-dwelling older adults aged 75, 80, and 85 years (men n = 356 and women n = 469). We quantified 5 IC domains: vitality, locomotion, cognition, psychology, and sensory, using performance-based measurements and questionnaires, and estimated IC networks for 2 age (75 vs 80 and 85 years) and SRH (higher vs lower) groups separately for sexes. Differences in global network properties (eg, density, overall connectivity) and centrality indices were compared between the groups.
resultsIntrinsic capacity network density (ie, the number of edges) was higher in the 80- and 85-year-olds compared to the 75-year-olds, and in the worse compared to the better SRH group in both sexes. However, the differences in edge weights and global strength of the networks were statistically nonsignificant. Walking speed was the most central node in the estimated networks.
conclusionsWith increasing age and health decline, the IC network seems to become denser, which may indicate a loss of system resilience. Walking is a more complex activity than the others requiring the functioning of many subsystems, which may explain why it connects multiple domains in the IC network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.