ArticleScientific reports2024
The impact of Bayesian optimization on feature selection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-driven forensic sex prediction using CT-based nasal and maxillary sinus metrics.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Pockets to products: a data-driven approach for classification of monoterpene synthases.Digital discovery · 2026Article
- Optimization of a Q.Clear PET image reconstruction based on bayesian optimization in oncology and neurology applications.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026Article
- A new dual-scale nearest neighbor statistical feature construction algorithm for imbalanced data oriented to Gaussian naive bayes classifiers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Risk assessment of geologic hazards in county-slope units based on RF-AER-AHP combined models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Large-scale modeling for housing condition prediction using machine learning algorithms.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Machine Learning on Systematically Curated Data Reveals Key Determinants of Magnetic Hyperthermia Performance.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Machine learning for prediction of histologic chorioamnionitis (stage ≥II) in parturients receiving labor analgesia: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- An inventory of industrial solid waste in 337 cities of China: Applying machine learning for data completion.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Integrating evolutionary algorithms and enhanced-YOLOv8 + for comprehensive apple ripeness prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- ONE3A: one-against-all authentication model for smartphone using GAN network and optimization techniques.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Feature selection is an indispensable step for the analysis of high-dimensional molecular data. Despite its importance, consensus is lacking on how to choose the most appropriate feature selection methods, especially when the performance of the feature selection methods itself depends on hyper-parameters. Bayesian optimization has demonstrated its advantages in automatically configuring the settings of hyper-parameters for various models. However, it remains unclear whether Bayesian optimization can benefit feature selection methods. In this research, we conducted extensive simulation studies to compare the performance of various feature selection methods, with a particular focus on the impact of Bayesian optimization on those where hyper-parameters tuning is needed. We further utilized the gene expression data obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative to predict various brain imaging-related phenotypes, where various feature selection methods were employed to mine the data. We found through simulation studies that feature selection methods with hyper-parameters tuned using Bayesian optimization often yield better recall rates, and the analysis of transcriptomic data further revealed that Bayesian optimization-guided feature selection can improve the accuracy of disease risk prediction models. In conclusion, Bayesian optimization can facilitate feature selection methods when hyper-parameter tuning is needed and has the potential to substantially benefit downstream tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.