Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38366006›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparative evaluation of real-time PCR and ELISA for the detection of human fascioliasis.

Fatemeh Bakhshipour, Mohammad Zibaei, Mohammad Bagher Rokni, Abolfazl Miahipour, Farzaneh Firoozeh, Masoud Beheshti, Leila Beikzadeh, Gita Alizadeh, Mojgan Aryaeipour, Vahid Raissi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fatemeh BakhshipourDepartment of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box: 3149779453, Karaj, Iran.ORCID 0009-0000-2197-1285
Mohammad ZibaeiDepartment of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box: 3149779453, Karaj, Iran. zibaeim@sums.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0003-2265-7460
Mohammad Bagher RokniDepartment of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1048-2512
Abolfazl MiahipourDepartment of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box: 3149779453, Karaj, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8359-7452
Farzaneh FiroozehDepartment of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4026-4110
Masoud BeheshtiDepartment of Virology, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3988-239X
Leila BeikzadehDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Para-Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Gita AlizadehDepartment of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3664-4548
Mojgan AryaeipourDepartment of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Vahid RaissiDepartment of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-0504-2982
Jahrom University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fascioliasis is a zoonotic parasitic infection caused by Fasciola species in humans and animals. Despite significant advances in vaccination and new therapeutic agents, little attention has been paid to validating methods for the diagnosis of fascioliasis in humans. Serological techniques are convenient assays that significantly improves the diagnosis of Fasciola infection. However, a more sensitive method is required. The aim of this study was to compare the Real-Time PCR technique with the indirect-ELISA for the detection of Fasciola hepatica in human. Using a panel of sera from patients infected with Fasciola hepatica (n = 51), other parasitic infections (n = 7), and uninfected controls (n = 12), we optimized an ELISA which employs an excretory-secretory antigens from F. hepatica for the detection of human fascioliasis. After DNA extraction from the samples, molecular analysis was done using Real-Time PCR technique based on the Fasciola ribosomal ITS1 sequence. Of 70 patient serum samples, 44 (62.86%) samples were identified as positive F. hepatica infection using ELISA and Real-Time PCR assays. There was no cross-reaction with other parasitic diseases such as toxoplasmosis, leishmaniasis, taeniasis, hydatidosis, trichinosis, toxocariasis, and strongyloidiasis. The significant difference between the agreement and similarity of the results of patients with indirect ELISA and Real-Time PCR was 94.4% and 99.2%, respectively (Cohen's kappa ≥ 0.7; P = 0.02). Based on the Kappa agreement findings, the significant agreement between the results of ELISA and Real-Time PCR indicates the accuracy and reliability of these tests in the diagnosis of F. hepatica in humans.

Indexed as

FasciolaFasciola hepaticaFascioliasisAnimalsAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityZoonosesAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthELISAFasciolaHumanReal-time PCRSerum

Identifiers

PMID38366006
PMCPMC10873325
OpenAlexW4391880780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.