Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2024
Improved radiographic outcomes and decreased complications rate on the femoral side can be achieved by a novel designed whole-process robotic assisted hip system for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty on infection outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of orthopedic robots in total hip arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) was associated with a shorter learning curve, greater implant accuracy, and reduced team stress than conventional THA when performed by a junior surgeon: a comparative study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative complications due to inaccurate prosthesis positioning are the main causes of early revision. The aim of this study was to (1) determine whether novel designed whole-process robotic assisted hip system allowed better radiographic outcomes and lower complications risk on the femoral side particularly stem subsidence compared to conventional THA, and to (2) identify the comparison of early clinical outcomes. 72 patients were initially enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups. Finally, only 65 patients (31 RA-THAs, 34 C-THAs) were analyzed who had full 18-month follow-up data. Radiographic follow-up was performed at immediate and 6-month postoperatively, while clinical follow-up at 18-month postoperatively. Stem-related radiographic outcomes, femoral side complications and clinical scores were compared. The robotic arm allowed better radiographic outcomes of the femoral side, including a higher canal fill ratio (CFR) at B1 (P = 0.040), more neutral stem alignment (P = 0.029), lower subsidence (P = 0.023) and lower leg length discrepancy (LLD) (P = 0.010). In addition, low CFR at B1 (P = 0.001) was found the risk factor for subsidence. However, early clinical outcomes were consistent between both groups. The novel designed whole-process robotic assisted hip system covers both femoral and acetabular side operations. It allows accurate and safe manipulation of femoral side, including better stem-related radiographic outcomes and lower risk of subsidence and LLD. However, no advantage of robotic system in early clinical score was identified. Clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2100044124.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38365906What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.