ArticleScientific data2024
China's low-carbon policy intensity dataset from national- to prefecture-level over 2007-2022.
Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chinese Electric Vehicle Policy Database: A Dataset of Policy Goals, Instruments, and Supply Chain Stages.Scientific data · 2026Article
- China's carbon peaking policy intensity dataset across national, provincial, municipal to county-level over 2021 to 2025.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Navigating carbon neutrality: policy pathways and consistency on industrial decarbonization in China.Carbon balance and management · 2025Article
- Multi-level Supportive Policy Dataset for China's Resource-Based Cities (2003 to 2023).Scientific data · 2025Article
- The impact of China's low-carbon policies' intensity on the labor demand of listed companies.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Measuring China's Policy Stringency on Climate Change for 1954-2022.Scientific data · 2025Article
- City-level emergy metabolism accounts for China's 281 cities from 2000 to 2020.Scientific data · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low-carbon policies are essential for facilitating manufacturing industries' low-carbon transformation and achieving carbon neutrality in China. However, recent studies usually apply proxy variables to quantify policies, while composite indices of policy intensity measured by objectives and instruments focus more on the national level. It is deficient in direct and comprehensive quantification for low-carbon policies. Hence, having extended the meaning of policy intensity, this paper constructs a low-carbon policy intensity index quantified by policy level, objective and instrument via phrase-oriented NLP algorithm and text-based prompt learning. This process is based on the low-carbon policy inventory we built for China's manufacturing industries containing 7282 national-, provincial- and prefecture-level policies over 2007-2022. Lastly, we organize the dataset in two formats (.dta and .xlsx) for multidiscipline researchers. Apart from the inventory and intensity for each policy, the policy intensity is also aggregated to national-, provincial- and prefecture-level with sub-intensity for four objectives and three instruments. This dataset has potential uses for future studies by merging with macro and micro data related to low-carbon performances.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.