Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38365699›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Treatment strategies for simple elbow dislocation - a systematic review.

Franziska Lioba Breulmann, Sebastian Lappen, Yannick Ehmann, Martin Bischofreiter, Lucca Lacheta, Sebastian Siebenlist

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Return to Sport Following Elbow Dislocation: A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Soft Tissue Injury and Immobilization Are Both Required for Persistent Elbow Contracture in a Rat Model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Franziska Lioba BreulmannDepartment of Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, Munich, 81675, Germany.
Sebastian LappenDepartment of Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, Munich, 81675, Germany.
Yannick EhmannDepartment of Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, Munich, 81675, Germany.
Martin BischofreiterDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Ordensklinikum Barmherzige Schwestern Linz, Linz, 4010, Austria.
Lucca LachetaDepartment of Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, Munich, 81675, Germany.
Sebastian SiebenlistDepartment of Sports Orthopedics, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, Munich, 81675, Germany. sebastian.siebenlist@tum.de.
Technical University of Munich · DEDiakonissenkrankenhaus · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent treatment concepts for simple elbow dislocation involve conservative and surgical approaches. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the superiority of one treatment strategy over the other by a qualitative analysis in adult patients who suffered simple elbow luxation. STUDY

designA systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and following the suggestions for reporting on qualitative summaries was performed. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus, including variations and combinations of the following keywords: elbow, radiohumeral, ulnohumeral, radioulnar, luxation, and therapy. Seventeen studies that performed a randomized controlled trial to compare treatment strategies as conservative or surgical procedures were included. Reviews are not selected for further qualitative analysis. The following outcome parameters were compared: range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (Quick-DASH), recurrent instability, pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and time to return to work (RW).

resultsEarly mobilization after conservative treatment strategies showed improved ROM compared to immobilization for up to 3 weeks after surgery with less extension deficit in the early mobilization group (16° ± 13°. vs. 19.5° ± 3°, p < 0.05), as well as excellent clinical outcome scores. Surgical approaches showed similar results compared to conservative treatment, leading to improved ROM (115 vs. 118 ± 2.8) and MEPS: 95 ± 7 vs. 92 ± 4.

conclusionConservative treatment with early functional training of the elbow remains the first-line therapy for simple elbow dislocation. The surgical procedure provides similar outcomes compared to conservative treatment regarding MEPS and ROM for patients with slight initial instability in physical examination and radiographs. People with red flags for persistent instability, such as severe bilateral ligament injuries and moderate to severe instability during initial physical examination, should be considered for a primary surgical approach to prevent recurrent posterolateral and valgus instability. Postoperative early mobilization and early mobilization for conservatively treated patients is beneficial to improve patient outcome and ROM.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentElbow InjuriesElbow JointJoint DislocationsRange of Motion, ArticularEarly AmbulationHumansOrthopedic ProceduresRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeElbow instabilitySimple elbow dislocationSimple elbow luxationTreatment strategies

Identifiers

PMID38365699
PMCPMC10874000
OpenAlexW4391878919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.