ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024
Assessing the diagnostic utility of the Gaucher Earlier Diagnosis Consensus (GED-C) scoring system using real-world data.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delayed Diagnosis of Type 1 Gaucher Disease at Age 15 After Years of Mild Cytopenias and Splenomegaly: A Case Report and Long-Term Follow-Up.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- The Gaucher Earlier Diagnosis Consensus point-scoring system for children and young adults: a retrospective and prospective evaluation in Korea.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Obstacles to Early Diagnosis of Gaucher Disease.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGaucher disease (GD) is a rare autosomal recessive condition associated with clinical features such as splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and bone abnormalities. Three clinical forms of GD have been defined based on the absence (type 1, GD1) or presence (types 2 and 3) of neurological signs. Early diagnosis can reduce the likelihood of severe, often irreversible complications. The aim of this study was to validate the ability of factors from the Gaucher Earlier Diagnosis Consensus (GED-C) scoring system to discriminate between patients with GD1 and controls using real-world data from electronic patient medical records from Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel's second-largest state-mandated healthcare provider.
methodsWe applied the GED-C scoring system to 265 confirmed cases of GD and 3445 non-GD controls matched for year of birth, sex, and socioeconomic status identified from 1998 to 2022. The analyses were based on two databases: (1) all available data and (2) all data except free-text notes. Features from the GED-C scoring system applicable to GD1 were extracted for each individual. Patients and controls were compared for the proportion of the specific features and overall GED-C scores. Decision tree and random forest models were trained to identify the main features distinguishing GD from non-GD controls.
resultsThe GED-C scoring distinguished individuals with GD from controls using both databases. Decision tree models for the databases showed good accuracy (0.96 [95% CI 0.95-0.97] for Database 1; 0.95 [95% CI 0.94-0.96] for Database 2), high specificity (0.99 [95% CI 0.99-1]) for Database 1; 1.0 [95% CI 0.99-1] for Database 2), but relatively low sensitivity (0.53 [95% CI 0.46-0.59] for Database 1; 0.32 [95% CI 0.25-0.38]) for Database 2). The clinical features of splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia (< 50 × 10
conclusionIn this analysis of real-world patient data, certain individual features of the GED-C score discriminate more successfully between patients with GD and controls than the overall score. An enhanced diagnostic model may lead to earlier, reliable diagnoses of Gaucher disease, aiming to minimize the severe complications associated with this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.