Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38365610›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

Comparison of the effects of imputation methods for missing data in predictive modelling of cohort study datasets.

JiaHang Li, ShuXia Guo, RuLin Ma, Jia He, XiangHui Zhang, DongSheng Rui, YuSong Ding, Yu Li, LeYao Jian, Jing Cheng and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06666647 (Ambulance and Helicopter Response Times in Danish Emergency Medical Services), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06666647 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Ambulance and Helicopter Response Times in Danish Emergency Medical Services: Protocol for an Epidemiological Study. The AHRTEMIS Study

TypeobservationalSponsorPeter Martin HansenRan2025 to 2026Enrolled2,500,000ConditionsEmergency Medical Services, Response, Triage, Survival OutcomesArmsTreatment by ambulance or helicopter services with response times
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Acute lung allograft dysfunction predicts lung allograft failure: Construct validity of the 2026 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation spirometric definition.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2026
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

JiaHang LiDepartment of Public Health, Shihezi University School of Medicine, North 2th Road, Shihezi, 832003, Xinjiang, China.
ShuXia GuoDepartment of Public Health, Shihezi University School of Medicine, North 2th Road, Shihezi, 832003, Xinjiang, China.
RuLin MaDepartment of Public Health, Shihezi University School of Medicine, North 2th Road, Shihezi, 832003, Xinjiang, China.
Jia HeDepartment of Public Health, Shihezi University School of Medicine, North 2th Road, Shihezi, 832003, Xinjiang, China.
XiangHui ZhangDepartment of Public Health, Shihezi University School of Medicine, North 2th Road, Shihezi, 832003, Xinjiang, China.
DongSheng RuiDepartment of Public Health, Shihezi University School of Medicine, North 2th Road, Shihezi, 832003, Xinjiang, China.
YuSong DingDepartment of Public Health, Shihezi University School of Medicine, North 2th Road, Shihezi, 832003, Xinjiang, China.
Yu LiDepartment of Public Health, Shihezi University School of Medicine, North 2th Road, Shihezi, 832003, Xinjiang, China.
LeYao JianDepartment of Public Health, Shihezi University School of Medicine, North 2th Road, Shihezi, 832003, Xinjiang, China.
Jing ChengDepartment of Public Health, Shihezi University School of Medicine, North 2th Road, Shihezi, 832003, Xinjiang, China.
Heng GuoDepartment of Public Health, Shihezi University School of Medicine, North 2th Road, Shihezi, 832003, Xinjiang, China. guoheng@shzu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMissing data is frequently an inevitable issue in cohort studies and it can adversely affect the study's findings. We assess the effectiveness of eight frequently utilized statistical and machine learning (ML) imputation methods for dealing with missing data in predictive modelling of cohort study datasets. This evaluation is based on real data and predictive models for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.

methodsThe data is from a real-world cohort study in Xinjiang, China. It includes personal information, physical examination data, questionnaires, and laboratory biochemical results from 10,164 subjects with a total of 37 variables. Simple imputation (Simple), regression imputation (Regression), expectation-maximization(EM), multiple imputation (MICE) , K nearest neighbor classification (KNN), clustering imputation (Cluster), random forest (RF), and decision tree (Cart) were the chosen imputation methods. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) are utilised to assess the performance of different methods for missing data imputation at a missing rate of 20%. The datasets processed with different missing data imputation methods were employed to construct a CVD risk prediction model utilizing the support vector machine (SVM). The predictive performance was then compared using the area under the curve (AUC).

resultsThe most effective imputation results were attained by KNN (MAE: 0.2032, RMSE: 0.7438, AUC: 0.730, CI: 0.719-0.741) and RF (MAE: 0.3944, RMSE: 1.4866, AUC: 0.777, CI: 0.769-0.785). The subsequent best performances were achieved by EM, Cart, and MICE, while Simple, Regression, and Cluster attained the worst performances. The CVD risk prediction model was constructed using the complete data (AUC:0.804, CI:0.796-0.812) in comparison with all other models with p<0.05.

conclusionKNN and RF exhibit superior performance and are more adept at imputing missing data in predictive modelling of cohort study datasets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCardiovascular DiseasesCohort StudiesHumansMachine LearningSupport Vector MachineCardiovascular diseaseCohort studyImputation methodsMachine learningMissing data

Identifiers

PMID38365610
PMCPMC10870437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.