Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38365595›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

Extended use of point-of-care technology versus usual care for in-home assessment by acute community nurses in older adults with signs of potential acute respiratory disease: an open-label randomised controlled trial protocol.

Siri Aas Smedemark, Christian B Laursen, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl, Flemming S Rosenvinge, Karen Andersen-Ranberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05546073 (Advanced Use of Point-of-care Technology Versus Usual Care During In-home-assessment by Acute Community Nurses in Older Adults for Reducing Acute Hospital Admissions), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05546073 nacompletednot on this map

Advanced Use of Point-of-care Technology Versus Usual Care During In-home-assessment by Acute Community Nurses in Older Adults for Reducing Acute Hospital Admissions

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern DenmarkRan2022 to 2023Enrolled632ConditionsAcute Respiratory Disease, Acute IllnessArmsAdvanced point-of-care technology
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siri Aas SmedemarkDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Geriatric Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. siri.aas.smedemark@rsyd.dk.
Christian B LaursenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Dorte Ejg JarbølDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Flemming S RosenvingeDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Karen Andersen-RanbergDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Geriatric Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Odense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to ageing-related physiological changes, diagnosing older adults is challenging. Delayed disease recognition may lead to adverse health outcomes and increased hospitalisation, necessitating the development of new initiatives for timely diagnosis and treatment of older adults. Point-of-care technology, such as focused lung ultrasound scan and bedside analysis of blood samples (leucocytes with differential count, electrolytes, and creatinine) conducted in the patients' home, may support clinical decision-making, and potentially reduce acute hospital admissions. We present the protocol for a randomized controlled trial, which aims at assessing the effect of focused lung ultrasound scan and bedside blood analysis during in-home assessments among older adults with signs of potential acute respiratory disease on hospital admissions.

methodWe will use a parallel open-label, individually randomised controlled trial design in an acute community healthcare setting. The trial will initiate on October 2022 and is expected to end one year later. The study population will include older adults (65 + year), with at least one of the following inclusion criteria: Cough, dyspnoea, fever, fall, or rapid functional decline. Expected study sample will comprise 632 participants. Participants in the control group will receive usual care, while the intervention group will undergo extended point-of-care technology (focused lung ultrasound scan and bedside venous blood analysis), in addition to usual care. The primary outcome is acute hospital admission within 30 days follow-up. Secondary outcomes include readmissions, mortality, length of hospital stay, hospital-free days, complications during hospital admission, treatment initiations or changes, functional level, re-referrals to the acute community healthcare service, and contacts to the primary care physician. A tertiary outcome is the diagnostic accuracy of Acute Community Nurses for conducting focused lung ultrasound compared with a specialist. Outcomes will be analysed as intention-to-treat. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first randomised controlled trial examining the effect of extended use of point-of-care technology conducted in an in-home setting. We expect that the results may contribute to the development of new interventions aiming to improve timely diagnostics, treatment decisions, and reduce acute hospital admissions.

trial registrationwww. CLINICALTRIALS: org NCT05546073 (Date of registration: September 19th, 2022).

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsRespiratory Distress SyndromeAgedHospitalizationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTechnologyAcute community nurseFocused lung ultrasoundGeriatric AssessmentPoint-of-care technology

Identifiers

PMID38365595
PMCPMC10870485
OpenAlexW4391909274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.