Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38365583›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

Drug-target affinity prediction with extended graph learning-convolutional networks.

Haiou Qi, Ting Yu, Wenwen Yu, Chenxi Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. GSF-DTA: An Innovative Graph-Sequence Fusion Framework for Drug-Target Affinity Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haiou QiNursing Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China.
Ting YuOperating Room Department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310016, China. 3320108@zju.edu.cn.
Wenwen YuSchool of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Chenxi LiuSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.

Funding

General Project for Nursing Clinical Research at the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital affiliated with the Zhejiang University School of Medicine 2024HLKY09Zhejiang Province Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan Project - General Project for Clinical Observation Research 2024KY1128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-performance computing plays a pivotal role in computer-aided drug design, a field that holds significant promise in pharmaceutical research. The prediction of drug-target affinity (DTA) is a crucial stage in this process, potentially accelerating drug development through rapid and extensive preliminary compound screening, while also minimizing resource utilization and costs. Recently, the incorporation of deep learning into DTA prediction and the enhancement of its accuracy have emerged as key areas of interest in the research community. Drugs and targets can be characterized through various methods, including structure-based, sequence-based, and graph-based representations. Despite the progress in structure and sequence-based techniques, they tend to provide limited feature information. Conversely, graph-based approaches have risen to prominence, attracting considerable attention for their comprehensive data representation capabilities. Recent studies have focused on constructing protein and drug molecular graphs using sequences and SMILES, subsequently deriving representations through graph neural networks. However, these graph-based approaches are limited by the use of a fixed adjacent matrix of protein and drug molecular graphs for graph convolution. This limitation restricts the learning of comprehensive feature representations from intricate compound and protein structures, consequently impeding the full potential of graph-based feature representation in DTA prediction. This, in turn, significantly impacts the models' generalization capabilities in the complex realm of drug discovery.

resultsTo tackle these challenges, we introduce GLCN-DTA, a model specifically designed for proficiency in DTA tasks. GLCN-DTA innovatively integrates a graph learning module into the existing graph architecture. This module is designed to learn a soft adjacent matrix, which effectively and efficiently refines the contextual structure of protein and drug molecular graphs. This advancement allows for learning richer structural information from protein and drug molecular graphs via graph convolution, specifically tailored for DTA tasks, compared to the conventional fixed adjacent matrix approach. A series of experiments have been conducted to validate the efficacy of the proposed GLCN-DTA method across diverse scenarios. The results demonstrate that GLCN-DTA possesses advantages in terms of robustness and high accuracy.

conclusionsThe proposed GLCN-DTA model enhances DTA prediction performance by introducing a novel framework that synergizes graph learning operations with graph convolution operations, thereby achieving richer representations. GLCN-DTA does not distinguish between different protein classifications, including structurally ordered and intrinsically disordered proteins, focusing instead on improving feature representation. Therefore, its applicability scope may be more effective in scenarios involving structurally ordered proteins, while potentially being limited in contexts with intrinsically disordered proteins.

Indexed as

Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsDrug Delivery SystemsDrug DesignDrug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsDeep learningDrug discoveryDrug–target affinity predictionGraph learning-convolutional networks

Identifiers

PMID38365583
PMCPMC10874073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.