ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
Drug-target affinity prediction with extended graph learning-convolutional networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrieval-Guided Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Ebola Drug-Target Affinity Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- GSF-DTA: An Innovative Graph-Sequence Fusion Framework for Drug-Target Affinity Prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- GraESM-FuseDTA: adaptive gated multimodal fusion of graph neural networks and protein language models for robust drug-target affinity prediction.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Graph-based drug-target interaction modeling: from representation learning to output-driven drug discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- GraphTransDTA: Drug-Target Affinity Prediction with Graph Transformer for Multimodal Data Fusion.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- HopWD-DTA: a novel framework for drug-target affinity prediction fusing multi-hop neighborhoods and deep features.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- A novel method for drug-target affinity prediction by integrating predicted evolutionary information and multi-scale protein graphs.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Predicting drug-target interactions and binding affinity using an optimized deep learning approach.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Graph Learning in Bioinformatics: A Survey of Graph Neural Network Architectures, Biological Graph Construction and Bioinformatics Applications.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Learnable protein representations in computational biology for predicting drug-target affinity.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Review
- Predicting drug-target affinity through triple pre-activated random residual planet convolution coupled attention network and contact maps.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Article
- DTBA-net: Drug-Target Binding Affinity prediction using feature selection in hybrid CNN model.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Article
- Drug target affinity prediction based on multi-scale gated power graph and multi-head linear attention mechanism.PloS one · 2025Article
- A Multibranch Neural Network for Drug-Target Affinity Prediction Using Similarity Information.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Attention-based approach to predict drug-target interactions across seven target superfamilies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Advances in Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction via Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Study of Datasets, Data Preprocessing Techniques, and Model Architectures.Current drug targets · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh-performance computing plays a pivotal role in computer-aided drug design, a field that holds significant promise in pharmaceutical research. The prediction of drug-target affinity (DTA) is a crucial stage in this process, potentially accelerating drug development through rapid and extensive preliminary compound screening, while also minimizing resource utilization and costs. Recently, the incorporation of deep learning into DTA prediction and the enhancement of its accuracy have emerged as key areas of interest in the research community. Drugs and targets can be characterized through various methods, including structure-based, sequence-based, and graph-based representations. Despite the progress in structure and sequence-based techniques, they tend to provide limited feature information. Conversely, graph-based approaches have risen to prominence, attracting considerable attention for their comprehensive data representation capabilities. Recent studies have focused on constructing protein and drug molecular graphs using sequences and SMILES, subsequently deriving representations through graph neural networks. However, these graph-based approaches are limited by the use of a fixed adjacent matrix of protein and drug molecular graphs for graph convolution. This limitation restricts the learning of comprehensive feature representations from intricate compound and protein structures, consequently impeding the full potential of graph-based feature representation in DTA prediction. This, in turn, significantly impacts the models' generalization capabilities in the complex realm of drug discovery.
resultsTo tackle these challenges, we introduce GLCN-DTA, a model specifically designed for proficiency in DTA tasks. GLCN-DTA innovatively integrates a graph learning module into the existing graph architecture. This module is designed to learn a soft adjacent matrix, which effectively and efficiently refines the contextual structure of protein and drug molecular graphs. This advancement allows for learning richer structural information from protein and drug molecular graphs via graph convolution, specifically tailored for DTA tasks, compared to the conventional fixed adjacent matrix approach. A series of experiments have been conducted to validate the efficacy of the proposed GLCN-DTA method across diverse scenarios. The results demonstrate that GLCN-DTA possesses advantages in terms of robustness and high accuracy.
conclusionsThe proposed GLCN-DTA model enhances DTA prediction performance by introducing a novel framework that synergizes graph learning operations with graph convolution operations, thereby achieving richer representations. GLCN-DTA does not distinguish between different protein classifications, including structurally ordered and intrinsically disordered proteins, focusing instead on improving feature representation. Therefore, its applicability scope may be more effective in scenarios involving structurally ordered proteins, while potentially being limited in contexts with intrinsically disordered proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.