ArticleBMJ open2024
Can RESPiratory hospital Admissions in children with cerebral palsy be reduced? A feasibility randomised Controlled Trial pilot study protocol (RESP-ACT).
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe most common cause of morbidity and mortality in children with severe cerebral palsy (CP) is respiratory disease. BREATHE-CP (Better REspiratory and Airway Treatment and HEalth in Cerebral Palsy) is a multidisciplinary research team who have conducted research on the risk factors associated with CP respiratory disease, a systematic review on management and a Delphi study on the development of a consensus for the prevention and management of respiratory disease in CP. These strategies have not been investigated; therefore, it is not known if implementation is feasible, if they improve patient outcomes or if they are acceptable for families. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Mixed-method feasibility pilot randomised controlled trial with economic analysis. Twenty children with CP aged 0-12 years who are at risk of respiratory disease will be followed up for 1 year. All children will receive baseline assessments for comparison. The control group will receive usual care from their treating teams. The intervention group will receive comprehensive assessments from physiotherapy, speech pathology and respiratory medicine. An individualised investigation and treatment plan will then be made. Participants in both groups will complete fortnightly patient-reported outcome surveys to assess symptoms and health service use. Analysis will include assessments of acceptability through qualitative interviews, implementation by ability to recruit, randomise and retain, practicality including costs of intervention and hospitalisation, and explore efficacy through quality-of-life surveys and decreased health service use for respiratory-related symptoms. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics and governance approvals have been obtained through Child and Adolescent Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee. At completion, this study will lead to the design of the definitive protocol to test intervention efficacy that maximises recruitment, retention and adherence to interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000114943).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.