Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38365243›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2024

Distinct microbial hydrogen and reductant disposal pathways explain interbreed variations in ruminant methane yield.

Qiushuang Li, Zhiyuan Ma, Jiabin Huo, Xiumin Zhang, Rong Wang, Shizhe Zhang, Jinzhen Jiao, Xiyang Dong, Peter H Janssen, Emilio M Ungerfeld and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Isotopic HBMC microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Qiushuang LiKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China.
Zhiyuan MaCollege of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Jiabin HuoKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China.
Xiumin ZhangKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China.
Rong WangKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China.
Shizhe ZhangKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China.
Jinzhen JiaoKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China.
Xiyang DongKey Laboratory of Marine Genetic Resources, Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Xiamen 361005, China.
Peter H JanssenAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, Private Bag 11008, New Zealand.
Emilio M UngerfeldCentro Regional de Investigación Carillanca, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA), Temuco, Vilcún 4880000, Chile.
Chris GreeningDepartment of Microbiology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia.
Zhiliang TanKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China.
Min WangKey Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha, Hunan 410125, China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNInstitute of Subtropical Agriculture · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNAgResearch · NZAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUInstituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias · CLLanzhou University · CNMinistry of Natural Resources · CN

Funding

China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARAHunan Province Science and Technology Plan 2022NK2021National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFD1300900National Natural Science Foundation of China 32161143028Ningxia Province Science and Technology Plan 2021BEF02020Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region Chinese Academy of Sciences ISA2021203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ruminants are essential for global food security, but these are major sources of the greenhouse gas methane. Methane yield is controlled by the cycling of molecular hydrogen (H2), which is produced during carbohydrate fermentation and is consumed by methanogenic, acetogenic, and respiratory microorganisms. However, we lack a holistic understanding of the mediators and pathways of H2 metabolism and how this varies between ruminants with different methane-emitting phenotypes. Here, we used metagenomic, metatranscriptomic, metabolomics, and biochemical approaches to compare H2 cycling and reductant disposal pathways between low-methane-emitting Holstein and high-methane-emitting Jersey dairy cattle. The Holstein rumen microbiota had a greater capacity for reductant disposal via electron transfer for amino acid synthesis and propionate production, catalyzed by enzymes such as glutamate synthase and lactate dehydrogenase, and expressed uptake [NiFe]-hydrogenases to use H2 to support sulfate and nitrate respiration, leading to enhanced coupling of H2 cycling with less expelled methane. The Jersey rumen microbiome had a greater proportion of reductant disposal via H2 production catalyzed by fermentative hydrogenases encoded by Clostridia, with H2 mainly taken up through methanogenesis via methanogenic [NiFe]-hydrogenases and acetogenesis via [FeFe]-hydrogenases, resulting in enhanced methane and acetate production. Such enhancement of electron incorporation for metabolite synthesis with reduced methanogenesis was further supported by two in vitro measurements of microbiome activities, metabolites, and public global microbiome data of low- and high-methane-emitting beef cattle and sheep. Overall, this study highlights the importance of promoting alternative H2 consumption and reductant disposal pathways for synthesizing host-beneficial metabolites and reducing methane production in ruminants.

Indexed as

EuryarchaeotaReducing AgentsAnimalsCattleFermentationHydrogenMethaneRumenRuminantsSheepHydrogenMethaneReducing Agentselectron transferhydrogenasemethane emissionsmethanogenesismolecular hydrogenrumen fermentation

Identifiers

PMID38365243
PMCPMC10811737
OpenAlexW4390704722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.