Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38364040›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2024

Simulation of ultrasonic scattering from scatterer size distributions using Field II.

Hayley M Whitson, Ivan M Rosado-Mendez, Jonathan H Hale, Timothy J Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hayley M WhitsonDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-7188-5917
Ivan M Rosado-MendezDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0778-1260
Jonathan H HaleDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4266-9947
Timothy J HallDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9850-6031

Funding

U.W. RADIOLOGICAL SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32CA009206 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Bryan Patrick Bednarz · 1985 to 2026
$12.1M
Monitoring Changes in Cervical Microstructure During PregnancyR01HD072077 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FELTOVICH, HELEN, HALL, TIMOTHY J · 2013 to 2022
$6.1M
EASI: Shear Wave Elastography Assessment For Predicting Success Of Labor InductionR01HD096361 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI FELTOVICH, HELEN, GROBMAN, WILLIAM ADAM · 2018 to 2020
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009206NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072077NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD096361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative analysis of radio frequency (RF) signals obtained from ultrasound scanners can yield objective parameters that are gaining clinical relevance as imaging biomarkers. These include the backscatter coefficient (BSC) and the effective scatterer diameter (ESD). Biomarker validation is typically performed in phantoms which do not provide the flexibility of systematic variation of scattering properties. Computer simulations, such as those from the ultrasound simulator Field II, can allow more flexibility. However, Field II does not allow simulation of RF data from a distribution of scatterers with finite size. In this work, a simulation method is presented which builds upon previous work by including Faran theory models representative of distributions of scatterer size. These are systematically applied to RF data simulated in Field II. The method is validated by measuring the root mean square error of the estimated BSC and percent bias of the ESD and comparing to experimental results. The results indicate the method accurately simulates distributions of scatterer sizes and provides scattering similar to that seen in data from clinical scanners. Because Field II is widely used by the ultrasound community, this method can be adopted to aid in validation of quantitative ultrasound imaging biomarkers.

Identifiers

PMID38364040
PMCPMC10871870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.