ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
Link prediction using low-dimensional node embeddings: The measurement problem.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- SAF: A Spectral-Adaptive Fusion Algorithm for Link Prediction in Complex Networks.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ColdstartCPI: Induced-fit theory-guided DTI predictive model with improved generalization performance.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Link prediction of heterogeneous complex networks based on an improved embedding learning algorithm.PloS one · 2025Article
- Inconsistency among evaluation metrics in link prediction.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Link prediction using low-dimensional node embeddings: The measurement problem.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Link prediction accuracy on real-world networks under non-uniform missing-edge patterns.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Graph representation learning is a fundamental technique for machine learning (ML) on complex networks. Given an input network, these methods represent the vertices by low-dimensional real-valued vectors. These vectors can be used for a multitude of downstream ML tasks. We study one of the most important such task, link prediction. Much of the recent literature on graph representation learning has shown remarkable success in link prediction. On closer investigation, we observe that the performance is measured by the AUC (area under the curve), which suffers biases. Since the ground truth in link prediction is sparse, we design a vertex-centric measure of performance, called the VCMPR@k plots. Under this measure, we show that link predictors using graph representations show poor scores. Despite having extremely high AUC scores, the predictors miss much of the ground truth. We identify a mathematical connection between this performance, the sparsity of the ground truth, and the low-dimensional geometry of the node embeddings. Under a formal theoretical framework, we prove that low-dimensional vectors cannot capture sparse ground truth using dot product similarities (the standard practice in the literature). Our results call into question existing results on link prediction and pose a significant scientific challenge for graph representation learning. The VCMPR plots identify specific scientific challenges for link prediction using low-dimensional node embeddings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.