ArticlePloS one2024
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS): Assessing patient satisfaction and socioemotional benefits in the hospital setting.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient perspectives on ultrasound-guided interventions in respiratory medicine: an international, mixed-methods study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound on the Management of Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Reimbursement and Policy Considerations of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Rural Family Medicine.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026Article
- Personalized Nursing Approaches in Monitoring and Managing Hematoma Risks After Percutaneous Renal Biopsy: A Prospective Observational Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Observational
- Providers' and pregnant women's perspectives on obstetric point-of-care ultrasound use in peri-urban Karachi, Pakistan: a qualitative study.BMC digital health · 2026Article
- Article
- The merit of rural point-of-care ultrasound: Carotid pseudoaneurysm case report.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025Article
- Point-of-care ultrasonography in nephrology: Growing applications, misconceptions and future outlook.World journal of nephrology · 2025Review
- Article
- Advancing Digital Education Technologies by Empowering Nurses With Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Patient satisfaction using handheld ultrasound at emergency department in Jordan University Hospital.International journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of 6 handheld ultrasound devices by point-of-care ultrasound experts: a cross-sectional study.The ultrasound journal · 2024Article
- Article
- POCUS: Is It Time? … And Is There Time?Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
- An Academic Family Physician's Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Experience.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
- Patient Perspectives on Point-of-Care Ultrasound Examinations in Consultative Outpatient Internal Medicine Practice.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an imaging modality used to make expedient patient care decisions at bedside. Though its diagnostic utility has been extensively described, POCUS is not yet considered standard of care in inpatient settings. Data from emergency department settings suggest that POCUS may yield socioemotional benefits beyond its diagnostic utility; furthermore, elements of the POCUS experience are known to promote placebo effects. These elements likely contribute to a placebo-like "POCUS positive care effect" (PPCE) with socioemotional benefits for receptive patients. Our objective is to provide the first characterization of the PPCE and its facilitating factors in an inpatient setting. In this novel mixed-methods study, we recruited 30 adult patients admitted to internal medicine floors in an urban academic medical center, recorded observations during their routine POCUS encounters, and administered post-encounter surveys. We conducted complementary quantitative and qualitative analyses to define and assess the magnitude of the PPCE. We also aimed to identify factors associated with and facilitating receptiveness to the PPCE. The results indicated that POCUS improves patients' satisfaction with their hospital providers and care overall, as well as perceived care efficiency. Mutual engagement, strong therapeutic alliances, and interpreting POCUS images to provide reassurance are most closely associated with this PPCE. Patients who have lower anxiety levels, less severe illness, and received efficient care delivery during their hospitalizations are most receptive to the PPCE. We conclude that diagnostic POCUS has the potential to exert a positive care effect for hospitalized patients. This PPCE is associated with modifiable factors at the patient, provider, and environment levels. Together, our findings lay the groundwork for an optimized "therapeutic POCUS" that yields maximal socioemotional benefits for receptive patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.