Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38363661›Full record

ArticleNeural computation2024

Active Learning for Discrete Latent Variable Models.

Aditi Jha, Zoe C Ashwood, Jonathan W Pillow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aditi JhaPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A. aditijha@princeton.edu.
Zoe C AshwoodPrinceton Neuroscience Institute and Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A. zashwood@princeton.edu.
Jonathan W PillowPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, U.S.A. pillow@princeton.edu.

Funding

State-dependent Decision-making in Brainwide Neural CircuitsU19NS123716 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ZADOR, ANTHONY M · 2021 to 2025
$18.2M
Subcortical Neural Coding and DynamicsU19NS104648 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BRODY, CARLOS D · 2017 to 2021
$15.3M
Dissecting Sensorimotor Pathways Underlying Social Interactions: Models, Circuits, and BehaviorR01NS104899 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI BIALEK, WILLIAM, MURTHY, MALA · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Adaptive statistical algorithms for learning and control of neural dynamicsRF1DA056404 · NIDA · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI PARK, IL MEMMING, PILLOW, JONATHAN WILLIAM · 2022 to 2022
$969k
NIDA NIH HHS RF1 DA056404NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104899NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS104648NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS123716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active learning seeks to reduce the amount of data required to fit the parameters of a model, thus forming an important class of techniques in modern machine learning. However, past work on active learning has largely overlooked latent variable models, which play a vital role in neuroscience, psychology, and a variety of other engineering and scientific disciplines. Here we address this gap by proposing a novel framework for maximum-mutual-information input selection for discrete latent variable regression models. We first apply our method to a class of models known as mixtures of linear regressions (MLR). While it is well known that active learning confers no advantage for linear-gaussian regression models, we use Fisher information to show analytically that active learning can nevertheless achieve large gains for mixtures of such models, and we validate this improvement using both simulations and real-world data. We then consider a powerful class of temporally structured latent variable models given by a hidden Markov model (HMM) with generalized linear model (GLM) observations, which has recently been used to identify discrete states from animal decision-making data. We show that our method substantially reduces the amount of data needed to fit GLM-HMMs and outperforms a variety of approximate methods based on variational and amortized inference. Infomax learning for latent variable models thus offers a powerful approach for characterizing temporally structured latent states, with a wide variety of applications in neuroscience and beyond.

Identifiers

PMID38363661
PMCPMC12265946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.