ArticleSingapore medical journal2026
Increased left ventricular remodelling index in paradoxical low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction compared to normal-flow severe aortic stenosis.
Article in Singapore medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with paradoxical low-flow (LF) severe aortic stenosis (AS) despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) appear distinct from normal-flow (NF) patients, showing worse prognosis, more concentric hypertrophy and smaller left ventricular (LV) cavities. The left ventricular remodelling index (LVRI) has been demonstrated to reliably discriminate between physiologically adapted athlete's heart and pathological LV remodelling.
methodsWe studied patients with index echocardiographic diagnosis of severe AS (aortic valve area <1 cm 2 ) with preserved LVEF (>50%). The LVRI was determined by the ratio of the LV mass to the end-diastolic volume, as previously reported, and was compared between patients with LF and NF AS. Patients were prospectively followed up for at least 3 years, and clinical outcomes were examined in association with LVRI.
resultsOf the 450 patients studied, 112 (24.9%) had LF AS. While there were no significant differences in baseline clinical profile between LF and NF patients, LVRI was significantly higher in the LF group. Patients with high LVRI (>1.56 g/mL) had increased all-cause mortality (log-rank 9.18, P = 0.002) and were more likely to be admitted for cardiac failure (log-rank 7.61, P = 0.006) or undergo aortic valve replacement (log-rank 18.4, P < 0.001). After adjusting for the effect of age, hypertension, aortic valve area and mean pressure gradient on multivariate Cox regression, high LVRI remained independently associated with poor clinical outcomes (hazard ratio 1.64, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.25, P = 0.002).
conclusionPathological LV remodelling (increased LVRI) was more common in patients with LF AS, and increased LVRI independently predicts worse clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.