Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38363593›Full record

SynthesisJMIR public health and surveillance2024

Integrated Network Analysis of Symptom Clusters Across Monkeypox Epidemics From 1970 to 2023: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shu Su, Meng Jia, Yingni Yu, Hu Li, Wenwei Yin, Yi Lu, Rongzhong Huang, Rong Xiang, Huizhe Huang, Peng Hu

Open access · goldAbstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mpox: clinical patterns and implications for epidemic management - a cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shu Su *Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5299-237X
Meng Jia *Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2836-686X
Yingni YuKey Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0009-0007-9355-1889
Hu LiKey Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7917-7807
Wenwei YinKey Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2878-9149
Yi LuKey Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0009-0003-7277-0397
Rongzhong HuangKey Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3736-8653
Rong XiangKey Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6588-2724
Huizhe Huang *Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0009-0006-9478-7773
Peng Hu *Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8481-0841
Dalian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe worldwide spread of monkeypox (mpox) has witnessed a significant increase, particularly in nonendemic countries.

objectiveWe aimed to investigate the changing clinical symptoms associated with mpox from 1970 to 2023 and explore their interrelations.

methodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, 3 electronic databases were searched for English peer-reviewed studies conducted from January 1970 to April 2023 that reported any symptoms among confirmed mpox cases. We categorized the mpox epidemics into 3 periods: 1970-2002 (period 1, within the African region), 2003-2021(period 2, epidemics outside Africa), and 2022-2023 (period 3, worldwide outbreak). Following PRISMA guidelines, a meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence for each symptom. The correlation among symptoms was analyzed and visualized using network analysis.

resultsThe meta-analysis included 61 studies that reported 21 symptoms in 720 patients from period 1, 39 symptoms in 1756 patients from period 2, and 37 symptoms in 12,277 patients from period 3. The most common symptom among patients from all 3 periods was rash (period 1: 92.6%, 95% CI 78.2%-100%; period 2: 100%, 95% CI 99.9%-100%; and period 3: 94.8%, 95% CI 90.9%-98.8%), followed by lymphadenopathy (period 1: 59.8%, 95% CI 50.3%-69.2%; period 2: 74.1%, 95% CI 64.2%-84.1%; and period 3: 61.1%, 95% CI 54.2%-68.1%). Fever (99%, 95% CI 97%-100%), enlarged lymph nodes (80.5%, 95% CI 75.4%-85.0%), and headache (69.1%, 95% CI 4%-100%) were the main symptoms in period 1, with a significant decrease in period 3: 37.9%, 31.2%, and 28.7%, respectively. Chills/rigors (73.3%, 95% CI 60.9%-85.7%), fatigue (68.2%, 95% CI 51.6%-84.8%), and dysphagia/swallowing difficulty (61.2%, 95% CI 10.5%-100%) emerged as primary new symptoms in period 2 and decreased significantly in period 3. Most other symptoms remained unchanged or decreased in period 3 compared to the former 2 periods. Nausea/vomiting had the highest degree of correlation (with 13 symptoms) and was highly positively correlated with lymphadenopathy (r=0.908) and conjunctivitis (r=0.900) in period 2. In contrast, rash and headache were 2 symptoms with the highest degree of correlation (with 21 and 21 symptoms, respectively) in period 3 and were highly positively correlated with fever (r=0.918 and 0.789, respectively).

conclusionsThe manifestation of symptoms in patients with mpox has become more diverse, leading to an increase in their correlation. Although the prevalence of rash remains steady, other symptoms have decreased. It is necessary to surveil the evolving nature of mpox and the consequential changes in clinical characteristics. Epidemic countries may shift their focus on the potential association among symptoms and the high synergy risk.

trial registrationPROSPERO Registration: CRD42023403282; http://tinyurl.com/yruuas5n.

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxEpidemicsHumansSymptom Assessmentevolution trendsmeta-analysismonkeypoxmpoxnetwork analysisprevalencesymptoms

Identifiers

PMID38363593
PMCPMC10907939
OpenAlexW4391885025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.