Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38363527›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2024

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy or anlotinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitor for advanced small cell lung cancer with brain metastases.

Manyi Xu, Keda Shao, Yanhua Wang, Yue Hao, Zhengbo Song

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manyi XuThe Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310000, China.
Keda Shao *Department of Clinical Trial, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China.
Yanhua Wang *The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310000, China.
Yue HaoThe Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310000, China. deartreasurealicia@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4725-6084
Zhengbo SongDepartment of Clinical Trial, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, Zhejiang, China. songzb@zjcc.org.cn.
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNZhejiang Cancer Hospital · CN

Funding

Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province No.2022KY653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnlotinib, as a salvage treatment for patients after failure of third-line or later-line treatments for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), has shown efficacy in patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, the efficacy and safety of anlotinib alone or in combination with immunotherapy for SCLC with BMs remain unclear.

methodPatients treated with anlotinib alone or in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between April 2019 and February 2023 were identified. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe the progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial PFS (iPFS). A waterfall diagram was used to indicate changes in intracranial lesions.

resultsA total of 48 patients were included; 29 received anlotinib alone, and 19 were administered anlotinib plus ICI. Combination therapy, compared with anlotinib, was associated with significantly longer PFS and iPFS (PFS: 8.1 months vs. 2.5 months, P < 0.001; iPFS: 8.1 months vs. 2.5 months, P = 0.004). Similar results were observed in patients with multiple BMs (PFS: 8.1 months vs. 1.9 months, P = 0.001; iPFS: 8.1 months vs. 1.9 months, P = 0.002). After third-line or later-line treatments, patients treated with ICI plus anlotinib also achieved significant PFS and iPFS benefits (PFS: 8.4 months vs. 2.1 months, P < 0.001; iPFS: 9.2 months vs. 2.1 months, P = 0.002). No new or severe adverse events were observed with combination therapy.

conclusionThe combination of anlotinib and ICI has promising intracranial and extracranial efficacy with tolerable toxicity, and may be a therapeutic option for SCLC patients with BMs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIndolesLung NeoplasmsQuinolinesSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalanlotinibImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIndolesQuinolinesAnlotinibEfficacyImmunotherapySafetySmall cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID38363527
OpenAlexW4391880602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.