ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2024
Preliminary report on ultrashort perioperative partial-breast irradiation with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy for early-stage breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patterns of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence following partial vs. whole-breast irradiation: a retrospective comparative study of breast-conserving therapy.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePerioperative partial-breast irradiation (PBI) with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) is less invasive and more convenient than postoperative one. This study aimed to compare ultrashort perioperative MIB-PBI (uPBI) and conventional perioperative MIB-PBI (cPBI) performed during the same period of time.
methodsInclusion criteria of the study were patients aged ≥ 40 years and those with T0-2 (≤ 3 cm), N0-mi, and negative margins on mammography. The locoregional recurrence (LRR) and toxicity rates were compared between uPBI at a dose of 25.2 Gy in four fractions and cPBI at a dose of 32 Gy in eight fractions.
resultsIn total, 198 patients (151 with uPBI and 47 with cPBI) were evaluated. At a median follow-up of 20.1 months, one (0.66%) patient in the uPBI group had LRR. The 2-year ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence-free survival rates of the uPBI and cPBI groups were 98.7% and 100%, respectively. The highest toxicity grades were grade 1 in 23 (15.2%) and grade 2 in 2 (1.3%) patients in the uPBI group, and grade 1 in 8 (17.0%) and grade 2 in 1 (2.1%) patient in the cPBI group. None of the patients in the two groups presented with grade 3 and higher toxicities. The toxicity rates between the two groups did not significantly differ. Further, 22 (14.6%) patients in the uPBI group and 8 (17.0%) in the cPBI group, and 3 (2.0%) patients in the uPBI group and 1 (2.1%) in the cPBI had acute and late toxicities, respectively. The timing of toxicity development between the two groups did not significantly differ.
conclusionsAlthough this preliminary report included a small sample size and had a short follow-up period, the local control and toxicity rates were similar between the uPBI and cPBI groups. Further research is warranted to investigate the ideal dose schedule of MIB-PBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.