ArticleDiscover oncology2024
The endoplasmic reticulum stress-related genes and molecular typing predicts prognosis and reveals characterization of tumor immune microenvironment in lung squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CNTN-1 regulates malignant biological behaviors of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) via the endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS)/epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) axis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- RHBDD1 induces cell cycle arrest in TP53-mutant NSCLC cells by promoting endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of p53 and DNA-PKcs.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Prognostic value and anti-tumor immunity role ofTranslational cancer research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) acts critical roles on cell growth, proliferation, and metastasis in various cancers. However, the relationship between ERs and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) prognoses still remains unclear.
methodsThe consensus clustering analysis of ERS-related genes and the differential expression analysis between clusters were investigated in LUSC based on TCGA database. Furthermore, ERS-related prognostic risk models were constructed by LASSO regression and Cox regression analyses. Then, the predictive effect of the risk model was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression, and ROC Curve analyses, as well as validated in the GEO cohort. According to the optimal threshold, patients with LUSC were divided into high- and low- risk groups, and somatic mutations, immune cell infiltration, chemotherapy response and immunotherapy effect were systematically analyzed.
resultsTwo ERS-related clusters were identified in patients with LUSC that had distinct patterns of immune cell infiltration. A 5-genes ERS-related prognostic risk model and nomogram were constructed and validated. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis showed that ERS risk score was an independent prognostic factor (p < 0.001, HR = 1.317, 95% CI = 1.159-1.496). Patients with low-risk scores presented significantly lower TIDE scores and significantly lower IC50 values for common chemotherapy drugs such as cisplatin and gemcitabine.
conclusionERS-related risk signature has certain prognostic value and may be a potential therapeutic target and prognostic biomarker for LUSC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.