Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38363398›Full record

ArticleStress biology2024

Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in tea plantation soil around Tai Lake region in Suzhou, China.

Xiaohan Xu, Jiahui Yang, Yang Zhang, Xueyan Sui, Zelong Gong, Shujing Liu, Xuan Chen, Xinghui Li, Yuhua Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stress biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaohan Xu *College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Jiahui Yang *College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yang ZhangJiangsu Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Nanjing, 210017, China.
Xueyan SuiJiangsu Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Nanjing, 210017, China.
Zelong GongCollege of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Shujing LiuCollege of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Xuan ChenCollege of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Xinghui LiCollege of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China.
Yuhua WangCollege of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China. wangyuhua@njau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tea plant [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze] is one of the important foliar cash crops in China, and its root system absorbs heavy metal (HM) elements enriched in the soil and transports them to the over ground part. In order to ensure the safety of the soil ecological environment and tea raw materials in the tea production area, the HM contents of soil and tea plant leaves in Suzhou tea plantations were detected, the relationship between HMs and soil physicochemical properties was analyzed, and the ecological risk of HMs in tea plantation soils was evaluated by using relevant detection techniques and evaluation models. The results showed that the average pH of tea plantation soils around Tai Lake in Suzhou was within the range suitable for the growth of tea plants. The pH, soil organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium of tea plantation soil satisfying the requirements of high quality, high efficiency and high yield ('3H') tea plantation accounted for 47.06%, 26.47%, 8.82%, 79.41% and 67.65%, respectively. Site 2 fully met the requirements of '3H' tea plantation. In addition, the contents of cadmium (Cd) and mercury (Hg) were extremely variable, and the average contents exceeded the background value of soil in Jiangsu Province, but the HM contents of tea leaves all met the pollution-free standard, and the HM contents of tea leaves around Tai Lake in Suzhou were generally at a safe level. The composite ecological risk index ranged from 0.05 to 0.60, and 32 of the 34 sample sites (except site 21 and site 23) are the most suitable agricultural land for tea plantations.

Indexed as

Ecological risk assessmentHeavy metalSoilTea plantations

Identifiers

PMID38363398
PMCPMC10873261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.