Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362563›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2024

Efficacy of neck muscle activation versus strengthening for adults with chronic cervical radiculopathy: a study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.

Farzana Sharmin, K M Amran Hossain, Feroz Kabir, Md Zahid Hossain, Sharmila Jahan, Ehsanur Rahman, Md Aminul Islam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Farzana SharminDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-9856-5939
K M Amran HossainDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.
Feroz KabirDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.
Md Zahid HossainDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.
Sharmila JahanDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.
Ehsanur RahmanDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.
Md Aminul IslamDepartment of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic cervical radiculopathy is a common condition characterised by neck and arm pain, numbness and weakness. Both neck muscle activation and strengthening exercises are widely recognised treatments for cervical radiculopathy, but there is a research gap on the efficacy of neck muscle activation versus strengthening. This protocol will determine the efficacy of neck muscle activation alongside conventional care versus strengthening exercise and conventional care for cervical radiculopathy. Methods and analysis: We planned a 5-week parallel, two-arm randomised clinical trial on 80 participants with chronic cervical radiculopathy (lasting over 3 months) between July and December 2023. Participants will be recruited from Dhaka's Agrani Specialised Physiotherapy Centre in Bangladesh and randomly assigned to two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Both groups will receive 14 sessions, each lasting 30-45 min. Post-treatment evaluations will be employed on Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), range of motion, craniovertebral angle (CVA), strength, endurance and Neck Disability Index (NDI) after 5 weeks and follow-up after 12 weeks of post-test analysis. Primary outcomes (strength, endurance and CVA) will be measured using a handheld dynamometer, digital inclinometer and goniometer. Secondary outcomes (pain, range of motion and disability) will be assessed through the BPI scale, digital inclinometer and NDI. Ethics and dissemination: The Institute of Physiotherapy Rehabilitation and Research of Bangladesh Physiotherapy Association has approved the study. All participants will provide informed consent, and data will be anonymised and accessible only to authorised personnel. The study's findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Clinical trial registry India: CTRI/2023/09/057587 (13/09/2023).

Indexed as

Cervical spineDisabilityMuscle damage/injuriesPhysical TherapyStrength isometric isokinetic

Identifiers

PMID38362563
PMCPMC10868178
OpenAlexW4391809318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.