ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024
Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage in Europe: a descriptive analysis of financial protection in 40 countries.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public Dental Expenditure and Dental Visits in Europe and Japan.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2026Article
- Association between regional income inequality and infant mortality rates in Türkiye: an ecological panel analysis of NUTS-2 regions, 2014-2024.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Service Coverage and Financial Hardship Under Universal Health Coverage: Uneven Associations Across 159 Countries (2000-2023).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Spending with purpose: tracking health expenditures in Tajikistan to inform progress toward UHC.Health policy OPEN · 2026Article
- Oral health care's contribution to catastrophic spending in Canada: a descriptive study.Health policy OPEN · 2026Article
- Good intentions and the costs of inaction: Financial protection in Austria.Health policy OPEN · 2026Article
- Exploring changes to financial protection and equity in Lithuania following 2017-2020 policies to improve access to outpatient medicines.Health policy OPEN · 2026Article
- Dental Preventive Policies and Socio-Economic Inequalities in Oral Health: A Panel Data Analysis of EU Countries During and After COVID-19.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Examining the potential of mobile money-based health insurance for people living with HIV and hypertension or diabetes in Uganda.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Catastrophic health care expenditure among older people with non-communicable diseases in 11 European Union Member States.PloS one · 2026Article
- The Reform That Was Never Completed: Why Greece Must Redesign Its Health Financing Architecture.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Association of Unmet Healthcare Needs With Depressive Symptoms and COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Factors Among Adults, 2009-2022: A Nationwide Study in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Income-related inequality and horizontal inequity in healthcare utilization under population aging and labor market changes in Japan.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Catastrophic and impoverishing out-of-pocket payments for health care in Poland in 2013-2021.Health policy OPEN · 2025Article
- Measurement of catastrophic health expenditures in households with essential hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus in cold regions of China.Health economics review · 2025Article
- Excess healthcare utilization and costs linked to chronic conditions: a comparative study of nine European countries.European journal of public health · 2025Article
- Knocking for gold. How long must I? A survey report on international students seeking healthcare in Hungary.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to International Universal Health Coverage Reforms: A Realist Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2025Review
- Oral Health Care Out-of-Pocket Costs and Financial Hardship: A Scoping Review.Journal of dental research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ensuring that access to health care is affordable for everyone-financial protection-is central to universal health coverage (UHC). Financial protection is commonly measured using indicators of financial barriers to access (unmet need for health care) and financial hardship caused by out-of-pocket payments for health care (impoverishing and catastrophic health spending). We aim to assess financial hardship and unmet need in Europe and identify the coverage policy choices that undermine financial protection. Methods: We carry out a cross-sectional study of financial hardship in 40 countries in Europe in 2019 (the latest available year of data before COVID-19) using microdata from national household budget surveys. We define impoverishing health spending as out-of-pocket payments that push households below or further below a relative poverty line and catastrophic health spending as out-of-pocket payments that exceed 40% of a household's capacity to pay for health care. We link these results to survey data on unmet need for health care, dental care, and prescribed medicines and information on two aspects of coverage policy at country level: the main basis for entitlement to publicly financed health care and user charges for covered services. Findings: Out-of-pocket payments for health care lead to financial hardship and unmet need in every country in the study, particularly for people with low incomes. Impoverishing health spending ranges from under 1% of households (in six countries) to 12%, with a median of 3%. Catastrophic health spending ranges from under 1% of households (in two countries) to 20%, with a median of 6%. Catastrophic health spending is consistently concentrated in the poorest fifth of the population and is largely driven by out-of-pocket payments for outpatient medicines, medical products, and dental care-all forms of treatment that should be an essential part of primary care. The median incidence of catastrophic health spending is three times lower in countries that cover over 99% of the population than in countries that cover less than 99%. In 16 out of the 17 countries that cover less than 99% of the population, the basis for entitlement is payment of contributions to a social health insurance (SHI) scheme. Countries that give greater protection from user charges to people with low incomes have lower levels of catastrophic health spending. Interpretation: It is challenging to identify with certainty the coverage policy choices that undermine financial protection due to the complexity of the policies involved and the difficulty of disentangling the effects of different choices. The conclusions we draw are therefore tentative, though plausible. Countries are more likely to move towards UHC if they reduce out-of-pocket payments in a progressive way, decreasing them for people with low incomes first. Coverage policy choices that seem likely to achieve this include de-linking entitlement from payment of SHI contributions; expanding the coverage of outpatient medicines, medical products, and dental care; limiting user charges; and strengthening protection against user charges, particularly for people with low incomes. Funding: The European Union (DG SANTE and DG NEAR) and the Government of the Autonomous Community of Catalonia, Spain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.