Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362484›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2024

Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Medial Bursal-Side Fosbury Flop Tears Compared With Tendinous Avulsion Lesions.

Sean W L Ho, Tiago Martinho, Arash Amiri, Jeanni Zbinden, Xue Ling Chong, Hugo Bothorel, Philippe Collin, Alexandre Lädermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sean W L HoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Tiago MartinhoDivision of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Hôpital de La Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Arash AmiriDivision of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Hôpital de La Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Jeanni ZbindenDivision of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Hôpital de La Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Xue Ling ChongRoyal Square Medical Centre, Singapore.
Hugo BothorelResearch Department, Hôpital de La Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Philippe CollinAmerican Hospital of Paris, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
Alexandre LädermannFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the clinical and radiologic outcomes after surgical repair of medial bursal-side Fosbury flop rotator cuff tears compared with traditional avulsion of tendinous attachments lesions. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. All patients who had undergone arthroscopic posterosuperior repair were recruited. Patients with previous shoulder rotator cuff surgery were excluded. Recruited patients were divided into 2 groups: one presenting Fosbury flop tears and the other presenting with standard avulsion lesions. Preoperative demographics such as age, gender, and arm dominance were recorded. Range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction, Constant score, Single Alpha-Numeric Evaluation score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score were evaluated at 3 points in time: preoperatively, and at 6 months and minimum 1-year postoperatively. The healing of repaired cuffs was evaluated by ultrasound at 6 months. Results: Two hundred thirty-six patients were recruited, with 27 (11.4%) Fosbury flop tears and 209 (88.6%) tendon avulsions. Although there was no significant difference in gender or arm dominance between the groups, Fosbury flop tears had significantly older patients ( Conclusions: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of medial bursal side Fosbury Flop rotator cuff tears results in favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes at 4 years after surgery. These outcomes are comparable with surgically repaired avulsion lesions, with an acceptable retear rate after arthroscopic repair. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Identifiers

PMID38362484
PMCPMC10867421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.