Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362479›Full record

ArticleApplied sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2020

RBC Storage Lesion Studies in Humans and Experimental Models of Shock.

Willard N Applefeld, Jeffrey Wang, Steven B Solomon, Junfeng Sun, Harvey G Klein, Charles Natanson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Willard N ApplefeldCritical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1662, USA.
Jeffrey WangCritical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1662, USA.
Steven B SolomonCritical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1662, USA.
Junfeng SunCritical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1662, USA.
Harvey G KleinDepartment of Transfusion Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1184, USA.
Charles NatansonCritical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1662, USA.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Is there a difference between transfusing old vs fresh blood in critical illnessZIACL090026 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI SOLOMON, STEVEN · 2010 to 2024
$0k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CL090026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The finding of toxicity in a meta-analysis of observational clinical studies of transfused longer stored red blood cells (RBC) and ethical issues surrounding aging blood for human studies prompted us to develop an experimental model of RBC transfusion. Transfusing older RBCs during canine pneumonia increased mortality rates. Toxicity was associated with in vivo hemolysis with release of cell-free hemoglobin (CFH) and iron. CFH can scavenge nitric oxide, causing vasoconstriction and endothelial injury. Iron, an essential bacterial nutrient, can worsen infections. This toxicity was seen at commonly transfused blood volumes (2 units) and was altered by the severity of pneumonia. Washing longer-stored RBCs mitigated these detrimental effects, but washing fresh RBCs actually increased them. In contrast to septic shock, transfused longer stored RBCs proved beneficial in hemorrhagic shock by decreasing reperfusion injury. Intravenous iron was equivalent in toxicity to transfusion of longer stored RBCs and both should be avoided during infection. Storage of longer-stored RBCs at 2 °C instead of higher standard temperatures (4-6 °C) minimized the release of CFH and iron. Haptoglobin, a plasma protein that binds CFH and increases its clearance, minimizes the toxic effects of longer-stored RBCs during infection and is a biologically plausible novel approach to treat septic shock.

Indexed as

blood transfusioncell free hemoglobinhaptoglobinironpneumoniasepsisshock

Identifiers

PMID38362479
PMCPMC10868675
OpenAlexW3011857184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.