Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362419›Full record

ArticleChemical science2024

Artificial design of organic emitters

AkshatKumar Nigam, Robert Pollice, Pascal Friederich, Alán Aspuru-Guzik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI-driven drug design: a comprehensive review.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Donor-Acceptor-Substituted 5-Azaazulenes.The Journal of organic chemistry · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Parametrization of κACS catalysis · 2025
    Article
  11. Singlet-Triplet Inversions in Through-Bond Charge-Transfer States.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

AkshatKumar NigamChemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto 80 St. George St Toronto Ontario M5S 3H6 Canada r.pollice@rug.nl aspuru@utoronto.ca.
Robert PolliceChemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto 80 St. George St Toronto Ontario M5S 3H6 Canada r.pollice@rug.nl aspuru@utoronto.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8836-6266
Pascal FriederichChemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto 80 St. George St Toronto Ontario M5S 3H6 Canada r.pollice@rug.nl aspuru@utoronto.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-1465
Alán Aspuru-GuzikChemical Physics Theory Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto 80 St. George St Toronto Ontario M5S 3H6 Canada r.pollice@rug.nl aspuru@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design of molecules requires multi-objective optimizations in high-dimensional chemical space with often conflicting target properties. To navigate this space, classical workflows rely on the domain knowledge and creativity of human experts, which can be the bottleneck in high-throughput approaches. Herein, we present an artificial molecular design workflow relying on a genetic algorithm and a deep neural network to find a new family of organic emitters with inverted singlet-triplet gaps and appreciable fluorescence rates. We combine high-throughput virtual screening and inverse design infused with domain knowledge and artificial intelligence to accelerate molecular generation significantly. This enabled us to explore more than 800 000 potential emitter molecules and find more than 10 000 candidates estimated to have inverted singlet-triplet gaps (INVEST) and appreciable fluorescence rates, many of which likely emit blue light. This class of molecules has the potential to realize a new generation of organic light-emitting diodes.

Identifiers

PMID38362419
PMCPMC10866360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.