Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362364›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2024

Cytochrome P450 inhibitor/inducer treatment patterns among patients in the United States with advanced ovarian cancer who were prescribed or were eligible for poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in the first-line maintenance setting.

Bobbie J Rimel, Dana M Chase, Jessica Perhanidis, Armen A Ghazarian, Ella Xiaoyan Du, Travis Wang, Jinlin Song, Amanda K Golembesky, Jean A Hurteau, Linda Kalilani and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Approaches to repurposing reverse transcriptase antivirals in cancer.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bobbie J RimelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Dana M ChaseGynecologic Oncology Division, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jessica PerhanidisValue Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Waltham, MA, USA.
Armen A GhazarianValue Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Rockville, MD, USA.
Ella Xiaoyan DuAnalysis Group, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Travis WangAnalysis Group, Boston, MA, USA.
Jinlin SongAnalysis Group, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Amanda K GolembeskyValue Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Durham, NC, USA.
Jean A HurteauUS Medical Affairs, GSK, Waltham, MA, USA.
Linda KalilaniValue Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Durham, NC, USA.
Ritu SalaniGynecologic Oncology Division, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Bradley J MonkHonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Analysis Group (United States) · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USHealth Outcomes Solutions (United States) · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are metabolized either via carboxylesterase (niraparib) or cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes (olaparib and rucaparib). Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (aOC) who receive concomitant medication metabolized by the CYP system may be at risk of drug-drug interactions impacting PARPi efficacy and tolerability. This study investigated CYP inhibitor/inducer treatment patterns in the first-line maintenance (1Lm) setting for patients with aOC. This retrospective cohort study used de-identified databases of US patients with aOC. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with aOC between January 2015-March 2021, and received CYP inhibitors/inducers during 1Lm PARPi initiation or the eligibility window (90 days before to 120 days after first-line platinum-based therapy ended [index]). Patients were either prescribed 1Lm PARPi monotherapy (PARPi cohort) or were not prescribed any 1Lm therapy within 120 days post-index (PARPi-eligible cohort). Strong/moderate CYP inhibitors/inducers were defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratio (AUCR) ≥2 or clearance ratio (CL) ≤0.5 (inhibitors), and AUCR ≤0.5 or CL ratio ≥2 (inducers). Of 1411 patients (median age 63), 158 were prescribed PARPis and 1253 were PARPi-eligible. Among the PARPi cohort, 46.2%, 48.7%, and 5.1% were prescribed niraparib, olaparib, and rucaparib, respectively. For patients prescribed olaparib or rucaparib, 42.4% also received strong and/or moderate CYP inhibitors/inducers. This real-world study indicated a considerable proportion of patients received strong and/or moderate CYP inhibitors/inducers and were prescribed PARPis metabolized by the CYP system. Understanding potential impacts of concomitant CYP inhibitors/inducers on PARPi efficacy and safety is warranted.

Indexed as

Advanced ovarian cancerCYP450 inhibitor/inducerDrug interactionsPoly(ADP ribose) polymerase inhibition

Identifiers

PMID38362364
PMCPMC10867570
OpenAlexW4391738087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.