Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362341›Full record

ReviewJACC. Basic to translational science2024

Fibroblast Reprogramming in Cardiac Repair.

Qiaozi Wang, Brian Spurlock, Jiandong Liu, Li Qian

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACC. Basic to translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact ofJournal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Cells · 2026
    Article
  4. Past, Present and Future of Regenerative Gene Therapy for Ischemic Heart Failure.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Advances in fibroblast-based cardiac reprogramming in the treatment of heart disease.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cell reprogramming: methods, mechanisms and applications.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiaozi WangDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Brian SpurlockDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jiandong LiuDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Li QianDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Macrophage functional dynamics in adult heart regenerationR01HL164933 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Jiandong Liu · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
The role of RNA-binding protein Lin28a in hypertrophic cardiomyopathyR01HL139976 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIU, JIANDONG · 2019 to 2022
$2.1M
Molecular regulation of ventricular maturationR56HL133081 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIU, JIANDONG · 2017 to 2017
$389k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL139976NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL164933NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL133081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease is one of the major causes of death worldwide. Limited proliferative capacity of adult mammalian cardiomyocytes has prompted researchers to exploit regenerative therapy after myocardial injury, such as myocardial infarction, to attenuate heart dysfunction caused by such injury. Direct cardiac reprogramming is a recently emerged promising approach to repair damaged myocardium by directly converting resident cardiac fibroblasts into cardiomyocyte-like cells. The achievement of in vivo direct reprogramming of fibroblasts has been shown, by multiple laboratories independently, to improve cardiac function and mitigate fibrosis post-myocardial infarction, which holds great potential for clinical application. There have been numerous pieces of valuable work in both basic and translational research to enhance our understanding and continued refinement of direct cardiac reprogramming in recent years. However, there remain many challenges to overcome before we can truly take advantage of this technique to treat patients with ischemic cardiac diseases. Here, we review recent progress of fibroblast reprogramming in cardiac repair, including the optimization of several reprogramming strategies, mechanistic exploration, and translational efforts, and we make recommendations for future research to further understand and translate direct cardiac reprogramming from bench to bedside. Challenges relating to these efforts will also be discussed.

Indexed as

cardiac reprogrammingepigeneticsfibroblastiCM

Identifiers

PMID38362341
PMCPMC10864899
OpenAlexW4386885221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.