ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2024
Evaluation of an HPV vaccine toolkit to improve OB/GYN discussion of HPV vaccination.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: HPV (Human Papillomavirus) vaccination is a safe, effective method to prevent HPV-associated disease. Racial-ethnic disparities in HPV vaccination exist, which could lead to widening gaps in cervical cancer mortality. Provider discussion of HPV vaccination has been shown to be a primary factor for increasing vaccination rates. The objective of this study is to assess provider discussion of HPV vaccination pre and post implementation of an intervention, named the HPV Vaccine Toolkit, in an Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) clinic in Boyle Heights, Los Angeles. Study design and methods: This quality improvement study occurred over four cycles of development. Its design was guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior. The toolkit components included dot phrases (pre-written phrases to speed documentation), educational posters, electronic health record prompts, HPV vaccine referral guides, and educational sessions. Chart audits and pre- and post-providers surveys were performed between 2019 and 2021 to assess for an increase in provider discussion of the HPV vaccine, as well as to evaluate the various components of the toolkit. Results: Provider discussion increased over the four cycles of this intervention, with HPV vaccination discussion documented in 15 % of patients in 2019, 19 % of patients in 2020 and 47 % of patients in 2021. Gaps identified included limited discussion of vaccination at postpartum visits. Provider uncertainty of where to refer patients for the HPV vaccine decreased following the intervention. Conclusion: Discussion of HPV vaccination is an important preventative strategy that can be overlooked in OB/GYN clinics. Implementation of multicomponent strategies can increase provider discussion of HPV vaccination status, although barriers to discussion remain. Improved counseling on HPV vaccination could have significant impacts on reducing HPV-related disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.