Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362256›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2024

The effect of perineural injection therapy on neuropathic pain: a retrospective study.

Haekyu Kim, Hyae Jin Kim, Young-Hoon Jung, Wangseok Do, Eun-Jung Kim

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07245121 (Perineural Prolotherapy in Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07245121 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Perineural Prolotherapy in Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensRan2025 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsChronic Pain, Perineural Analgesia, Prolotherapy, Knee OsteoarthritisArmsDextrose 5% and Lidocaine, Lidocaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haekyu KimDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8804-3395
Hyae Jin KimDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1444-1125
Young-Hoon JungDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Biomedical research institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-2028
Wangseok DoDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Biomedical research institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2338-9648
Eun-Jung KimDepartment of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University, Dental Research Institute, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4982-9517
Pusan National University Hospital · KRPusan National University Dental Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Among the various pain-related diseases that can be encountered at the clinic, there is a neuropathic pain that is difficult to treat. Numerous methods have been proposed to treat neuropathic pain, such as taking medication, nerve block with lidocaine, or neurolysis with alcohol or phenol. Recently, a method of perineural injection using dextrose instead of lidocaine was proposed. This study was designed to compare the effects of perineural injection therapy (PIT) with buffered 5% dextrose or 0.5% lidocaine on neuropathic pain. Methods: The data were collected from the database of pain clinic from August 1st, 2019 to December 31st, 2022 without any personal information. The inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), trigeminal neuralgia (TN), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), or peripheral neuropathy (PN), and patients who had undergone PIT with buffered 5% dextrose (Dextrose group) or 0.5% lidocaine (Lidocaine group) for pain control. The data of patients, namely sex, age, and pain score (numerical rating scale, NRS) were collected before PIT. The data of NRS, side effects, and satisfaction grade (excellent, good, fair, or poor) were collected one week after each of the four PIT, and two weeks after the last PIT. Results: Overall, 112 subjects were enrolled. The Dextrose group included 89 and Lidocaine group included 23 patients. Because the number of patients in the Lidocaine group was too small to allow statistical analysis, the trend in Lidocaine group was just observed in each disease. There were no significant side effects except for a few bruise cases on the site of injection in all groups. The NRS in most Dextrose groups except CRPS were reduced significantly; however, the Lidocaine group showed a trend of pain reduction only in PHN. The Dextrose group except CRPS showed increased satisfaction two weeks after the final PIT. Conclusion: From the results, it is suggested that PIT with buffered 5% dextrose may have a good effect for neuropathic pain without any side effect except for patients with CRPS. This may offer a window into a new tool that practitioners can employ in their quest to help patients with neuropathic pain.

Indexed as

DextroseInjectionsLidocaineNeuropathic Pain

Identifiers

PMID38362256
PMCPMC10864712
OpenAlexW4392734548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.