Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362210›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

A sampling strategy for longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses using a large national claims database.

Timothy L McMurry, Jennifer M Lobo, Soyoun Kim, Hyojung Kang, Min-Woong Sohn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Timothy L McMurryDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Jennifer M LoboDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Soyoun KimDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.
Hyojung KangDepartment of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, United States.
Min-Woong SohnDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.

Funding

Detecting, Understanding, and Reducing Diabetes Belt Preventive Care DisparitiesR01DK113295 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI LOBO, JENNIFER MASON, SOHN, MIN-WOONG · 2018 to 2021
$2.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK113295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The United States (US) Medicare claims files are valuable sources of national healthcare utilization data with over 45 million beneficiaries each year. Due to their massive sizes and costs involved in obtaining the data, a method of randomly drawing a representative sample for retrospective cohort studies with multi-year follow-up is not well-documented. Objective: To present a method to construct longitudinal patient samples from Medicare claims files that are representative of Medicare populations each year. Design: Retrospective cohort and cross-sectional designs. Participants: US Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes over a 10-year period. Methods: Medicare Master Beneficiary Summary Files were used to identify eligible patients for each year in over a 10-year period. We targeted a sample of ~900,000 patients per year. The first year's sample is stratified by county and race/ethnicity (white vs. minority), and targeted at least 250 patients in each stratum with the remaining sample allocated proportional to county population size with oversampling of minorities. Patients who were alive, did not move between counties, and stayed enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) were retained in the sample for subsequent years. Non-retained patients (those who died or were dropped from Medicare) were replaced with a sample of patients in their first year of Medicare FFS eligibility or patients who moved into a sampled county during the previous year. Results: The resulting sample contains an average of 899,266 ± 408 patients each year over the 10-year study period and closely matches population demographics and chronic conditions. For all years in the sample, the weighted average sample age and the population average age differ by <0.01 years; the proportion white is within 0.01%; and the proportion female is within 0.08%. Rates of 21 comorbidities estimated from the samples for all 10 years were within 0.12% of the population rates. Longitudinal cohorts based on samples also closely resembled the cohorts based on populations remaining after 5- and 10-year follow-up. Conclusions and relevance: This sampling strategy can be easily adapted to other projects that require random samples of Medicare beneficiaries or other national claims files for longitudinal follow-up with possible oversampling of sub-populations.

Indexed as

Fee-for-Service PlansMedicareAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited Statescross-sectional designdiabeteslongitudinal analysisMedicare claimssample

Identifiers

PMID38362210
PMCPMC10867963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.