ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Coffee and the risk of osteoarthritis: a two-sample, two-step multivariable Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Mendelian randomization analyses in osteoarthritis: state of art and future perspectives.Annals of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Combining Mendelian randomization and multiomics data to determine the causal relationship between systemic inflammation and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer cell international · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a new nomogram for self-reported OA based on machine learning: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The role of coffee and potential mediators in subclinical atherosclerosis: insights from Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- The impact of coffee consumption on osteoarthritis: insights from NHANES and Mendelian randomization analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.