Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362197›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2024

Treatment outcome and prognostic factors of inverted papilloma involving the frontal sinus.

Sung-Woo Cho, Su Geun Kim, Doo Hee Han, Hyun Jik Kim, Jeong-Whun Kim, Dong-Young Kim, Chae-Seo Rhee, Tae-Bin Won

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic significance of pre-operative diagnosis in sinonasal inverted papilloma: recurrence-free survival analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sung-Woo ChoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seoul National University College of Medicine Seongnam South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0827-4471
Su Geun KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seoul National University College of Medicine Seongnam South Korea.
Doo Hee HanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3367-1495
Hyun Jik KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul South Korea.
Jeong-Whun KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seoul National University College of Medicine Seongnam South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4858-3316
Dong-Young KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4000-1011
Chae-Seo RheeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seoul National University College of Medicine Seongnam South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1361-8585
Tae-Bin WonDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seoul National University College of Medicine Seongnam South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2266-3975
Seoul National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and treatment outcomes of inverted papillomas involving the frontal sinus. Methods: Patients treated for inverted papilloma involving the frontal sinus between 2003 and 2020 were reviewed. Tumors were classified based on their extent (Extent 1: partially encroaching on the frontal sinus; Extent 2: completely filling the frontal sinus; Extent 3: eroding bony borders beyond the frontal sinus) and site of origin (Origin 1: originating outside the frontal sinus and prolapsing into the frontal sinus; Origin 2: originating from the frontal sinus walls medial to the vertical plane of the lamina papyracea; Origin 3: originating from the frontal sinus walls lateral to the vertical plane of the lamina papyracea). Treatment outcomes including tumor recurrence and patency of the frontal recess were analyzed according to tumor characteristics and surgical treatment modalities. Results: A total of 49 surgical cases were analyzed. Extent 1 were the most common type ( Conclusion: The recurrence rate of frontal sinus inverted papilloma depends on tumor origin rather than the extent of the tumor. In particular, lesions originating from the frontal sinus lateral to the lamina papyracea recur frequently. Draf III frontal sinusotomy can achieve patent frontal recess allowing active surveillance. Level of Evidence: IV.

Indexed as

frontal sinusinverted papillomaprognostic factortreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID38362197
PMCPMC10866576
OpenAlexW4390229710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.