Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362194›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2024

A scoping review of Rasch analysis and item response theory in otolaryngology: Implications and future possibilities.

David T Liu, Christian A Mueller, Ahmad R Sedaghat

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David T LiuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6948-737X
Christian A MuellerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6172-5417
Ahmad R SedaghatDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6331-2325

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Item response theory (IRT) is a methodological approach to studying the psychometric performance of outcome measures. This study aims to determine and summarize the use of IRT in otolaryngological scientific literature. Methods: A systematic search of the Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed for original English-language published studies indexed up to January 28, 2023, per the following search strategy: ("item response theory" OR "irt" OR "rasch" OR "latent trait theory" OR "modern mental test theory") AND ("ent" OR "otorhinolaryngology" OR "ear" OR "nose" OR "throat" OR "otology" OR "audiology" OR "rhinology" OR "laryngology" OR "neurotology" OR "facial plastic surgery"). Results: Fifty-five studies were included in this review. IRT was used across all subspecialties in otolaryngology, and most studies utilizing IRT methodology were published within the last decade. Most studies analyzed polytomous response data, and the most commonly used IRT models were the partial credit and the rating scale model. There was considerable heterogeneity in reporting the main assumptions and results of IRT. Conclusion: IRT is increasingly being used in the otolaryngological scientific literature. In the otolaryngology literature, IRT is most frequently used in the study of patient-reported outcome measures and many different IRT-based methods have been used. Future IRT-based outcome studies, using standardized reporting guidelines, might improve otolaryngology-outcome research sustainably by improving response rates and reducing patient response burden. Level of evidence: 2.

Indexed as

ENTIRTitem response theoryotolaryngologyRaschsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38362194
PMCPMC10866592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.