Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362185›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2024

Timely delivery of PORT for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a county hospital.

Ana Maria Rosas Herrera, Angela D Haskins, Alexander N Hanania, Pavan M Jhaveri, Christina H Chapman, Quillan Huang, David J Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Implementation Mapping to Identify Strategies to Increase Timely Postoperative Radiotherapy Initiation for Head/Neck Cancer.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana Maria Rosas HerreraBobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.
Angela D HaskinsBobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.
Alexander N HananiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.
Pavan M JhaveriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.
Christina H ChapmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.
Quillan HuangSection of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.
David J HernandezBobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-5966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the rate of post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) initiation within 6 weeks for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated at a safety net, academic institutio between 2019 and 2021 versus those treated in 2022 after implementation of a new clinical pathway. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was performed at a single tertiary care, safety-net, academic institution. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, dates of surgery, and other treatment dates were collected from the electronic medical record. The time from surgery to PORT was calculated. Patients who started radiation treatment within 42 days of surgery were regarded as having started PORT on time. The demographics, tumor characteristics, and rate of timely PORT for the two cohorts of patients were compared. Results: From 2018 to 2021, our rate of PORT initiation within 6 weeks of surgery was 12% ( Conclusion: Early referrals, frequent communication, and use of a secure registry were the key to the success found by our group despite the socioeconomic challenges of our underserved, safety-net hospital patient population. The changes made at our institution should serve as a template for other institutions seeking to improve the quality of care for their HNSCC patients.

Indexed as

head and neck cancerpost‐operative radiationquality improvementsafety‐net hospital

Identifiers

PMID38362185
PMCPMC10866599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.