Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362137›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical education2024

Use of Uncertainty Calculation Software as a Didactic Tool to Improve the Knowledge of Chemistry Students in Analytical Method Validation.

Maria Cerrato-Alvarez, Samuel Frutos-Puerto, Eduardo Pinilla-Gil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria Cerrato-AlvarezDepartamento de Química Analítica, Universidad de Extremadura, Av. de Elvas s/n, 06006 Badajoz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4057-4493
Samuel Frutos-PuertoDepartamento de Química Analítica, Universidad de Extremadura, Av. de Elvas s/n, 06006 Badajoz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2026-9205
Eduardo Pinilla-GilDepartamento de Química Analítica, Universidad de Extremadura, Av. de Elvas s/n, 06006 Badajoz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5873-7580

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calculating analytical uncertainties as a part of method validation is a relevant aspect of field and laboratory practices in instrumental analytical chemistry subjects, which usually require complex algorithms. This work describes the development and didactic use of an automatic and straightforward informatics tool, implemented in an Excel macro, for calculating and interpreting the uncertainty of an analytical method against a reference method on field measurements. The software was initially developed for field testing of low-cost air quality monitoring analytical methods against reference methods, and the present work shows its adaptation to a didactic environment. The uncertainty calculation software was implemented through an Excel macro based on Visual Basic as a graphical user interface. It finds a best-fit line that describes the relation between concentrations determined by the candidate and reference methods. The software generates the analytical validation results (slope and intercept with their respective confidence limits, and expanded uncertainty of a concentration determined by the candidate method), hiding the intermediate functions and calculations. The Excel interface eases uncertainty calculations for undergraduate students, although the background mathematics can be quickly unveiled to students for didactic purposes. This tool has been applied to a laboratory exercise focused on validating experimental results obtained in the measurement of ozone levels in ambient air by passive sampling and spectrophotometric detection. The uncertainty calculation software has proved valuable by providing the student a resource to check the analytical quality of the data generated in the laboratory, while assimilating the fundamentals behind the calculations.

Identifiers

PMID38362137
PMCPMC10865931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.