ArticleClinical nutrition research2024
Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patient With Septic Shock Requiring Vasopressor: Case Report.
Article in Clinical nutrition research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutritional support in critically ill patients is an essential aspect of treatment. In particular, the benefits of enteral nutrition (EN) are well recognized, and various guidelines recommend early EN within 48 hours in critically ill patients. However, there is still controversy regarding EN in critically ill patients with septic shock requiring vasopressors. Therefore, this case report aims to provide basic data for the safe and effective nutritional support in septic shock patients who require vasopressors. A 62-year-old male patient was admitted to the intensive care unit with a deep neck infection and mediastinitis that progressed to a septic condition. Mechanical ventilation was initiated after intubation due to progression of respiratory acidosis and deterioration of mental status, and severe hypotension required the initiation of norepinephrine. Due to hemodynamic instability, the patient was kept nil per os. Subsequently, trophic feeding was initiated at the time of norepinephrine dose tapering and was gradually increased to achieve 75% of the energy requirement through EN by the 7th day of enteral feeding initiation. Although there were signs of feeding intolerance during the increasing phase of EN, adjusting the rate of EN resolved the issue. This case report demonstrates the gradual progression and adherence to EN in septic shock patient requiring vasopressors, and the progression observed was relatively consistent with existing studies and guidelines. In the future, further case reports and continuous research will be deemed necessary for safe and effective nutritional support in critically ill patients with septic shock requiring vasopressors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.