ReviewPolish journal of radiology2023
The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: what has changed in diagnostic criteria?
Review in Polish journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning-based neuroanatomical profiling reveals population-specific brain changes in multiple sclerosis: a large-scale Middle Eastern study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Observational
- CSF κ-Free light chain index in suspected multiple sclerosis: diagnostic performance vs. Oligoclonal bands and alignment with 2017/2024 McDonald criteria.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- Multiple Sclerosis During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: Diagnostic and Multidisciplinary Challenges in Two Cases.International medical case reports journal · 2026Article
- Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Diagnosis and Its Differentiation from Neurological Mimics, MS and ALS: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Utility of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Metrics in Assessing Disability in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Physiotherapy for Sexual Dysfunctions in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Review of Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Investigating the Role of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Evaluating Multiple Sclerosis Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, demyelinating disease affecting the central nervous system. Diagnosis of MS is based on the proof of disease dissemination in time (DIT) and dissemination in space (DIS) and excluding other disorders that can mimic multiple sclerosis in laboratory tests and clinical manifestation. Over the years the diagnostic criteria have evolved; the introduction of magnetic resonance in the McDonald's 2001 criteria was revolutionary. Since then, the criteria have been modified up to the currently used McDonald 2017. The aim of this review is to analyse the 2017 McDonald criteria, assess what has changed from the 2010 criteria, and present the impact of revised criteria on rapid and accurate diagnosis of MS. The main differences are as follows: inclusion of oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid as a DIT criterion, and symptomatic and cortical lesions in magnetic resonance imaging are counted in the determination of DIS and DIT. We present also the newest recommendations of the Polish Medical Society of Radiology and the Polish Society of Neurology and international group of North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis and Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, as well as future directions for further investigations. A proper diagnosis is crucial for the patient's quality of life, to give the possibility of early treatment, and to help avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.