Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38362001›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024

Predicting preterm birth using auto-ML frameworks: a large observational study using electronic inpatient discharge data.

Deming Kong, Ye Tao, Haiyan Xiao, Huini Xiong, Weizhong Wei, Miao Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deming Kong *Wuhan Children's Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Ye Tao *Wuhan Children's Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Haiyan Xiao *Wuhan Children's Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Huini Xiong *Wuhan Children's Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Weizhong WeiWuhan Children's Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Miao CaiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To develop and compare different AutoML frameworks and machine learning models to predict premature birth. Methods: The study used a large electronic medical record database to include 715,962 participants who had the principal diagnosis code of childbirth. Three Automatic Machine Learning (AutoML) were used to construct machine learning models including tree-based models, ensembled models, and deep neural networks on the training sample ( Results: The H2O AutoML framework had the highest median AUC of 0.846, followed by AutoGluon (median AUC: 0.840) and Auto-sklearn (median AUC: 0.820), and the median training time was the lowest for H2O AutoML (0.14 min), followed by AutoGluon (0.16 min) and Auto-sklearn (4.33 min). Among different types of machine learning models, the Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) or Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), stacked ensemble, and random forrest models had better predictive performance, with median AUC scores being 0.846, 0.846, and 0.842, respectively. Important features related to preterm birth included premature rupture of membrane (PROM), incompetent cervix, occupation, and preeclampsia. Conclusions: Our study highlights the potential of machine learning models in predicting the risk of preterm birth using readily available electronic medical record data, which have significant implications for improving prenatal care and outcomes.

Indexed as

administrative dataautoMLChinamachine learningpreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID38362001
PMCPMC10867966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.