ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Development and multi-institutional validation of a deep learning model for grading of vesicoureteral reflux on voiding cystourethrogram: a retrospective multicenter study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Supported Prediction of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children Based on Cystoscopic Configuration of the Ureteric Orifice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning model for predicting kidney failure among CAKUT children in multicenter large-scale study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Quantifying Sagittal Craniosynostosis Severity: A Machine Learning Approach With CranioRate.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026Article
- Noninvasive Risk Stratification Based on Renal Tubular Injury Phenotypes: A Deep Learning Study for Predicting Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting vesicoureteral reflux outcomes using artificial intelligence: A critical appraisal using APPRAISE-AI.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- Article
- Automated Grading of Vesicoureteral Reflux (VUR) Using a Dual-Stream CNN Model with Deep Supervision.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Dynamic Multi-Image Weighting for Automated Detection and Diagnosis of Abnormal Urinary Tract on Voiding Cystourethrography with a Deep Learning System: A Retrospective, Large-Scale, Multicenter Study.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- What paediatricians need to know about modern urologic management of vesicoureteral reflux.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- Primary vesicoureteral reflux.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is the gold standard for the diagnosis and grading of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). However, VUR grading from voiding cystourethrograms is highly subjective with low reliability. This study aimed to develop a deep learning model to improve reliability for VUR grading on VCUG and compare its performance to that of clinicians. Methods: In this retrospective study in China, VCUG images were collected between January 2019 and September 2022 from our institution as an internal dataset for training and 4 external data sets as external testing set for validation. Samples were divided into training (N = 1000) and validation sets (N = 500), internal testing set (N = 168), and external testing set (N = 280). An ensemble learning-based model, Deep-VCUG, using Res-Net 101 and the voting methods was developed to predict VUR grade. The grading performance was assessed using heatmaps, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 score in the internal and external testing set. The performances of four clinicians (2 pediatric urologists and 2 radiologists) with and without the Deep-VCUG assisted to predict VUR grade were explored in external testing sets. Findings: A total of 1948 VCUG images were collected (Internal dataset = 1668; multi-center external dataset = 280). For assessing unilateral VUR grading, the Deep-VCUG achieved AUCs of 0.962 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.943-0.978) and 0.944 (95% [CI]: 0.921-0.964) in the internal and external testing sets, respectively, for bilateral VUR grading, the Deep-VCUG also achieved high AUCs of 0.960 (95% [CI]: 0.922-0.983) and 0.924 (95% [CI]: 0.887-0.957). The Deep-VCUG model using voting method outperformed single model and clinician in terms of classification based on VCUG image. Moreover, Under the Dee-VCUG assisted, the classification ability of junior and senior clinicians was significantly improved. Interpretation: The Deep-VCUG model is a generalizable, objective, and accurate tool for vesicoureteral reflux grading based on VCUG imaging and had good assistance with clinicians to VUR grading applicability. Funding: This study was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China, "Fuqing Scholar" Student Scientific Research Program of Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, and the Program of Greater Bay Area Institute of Precision Medicine (Guangzhou).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.