ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024
Role of invasive mediastinal nodal staging in survival outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and without radiologic lymph node metastasis: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Updates on Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration and Its Clinical Implications.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2026Review
- Utilization of invasive mediastinal nodal staging and prevalence of occult nodal disease in patients with synchronous primary lung cancers.Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Development of PET/CT-clinical nomograms for predicting lymph node metastasis in primary lung cancer.European radiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Histological type, invasive mediastinal staging, and prognosis in patients with lung cancer.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer diagnostic guidelines advocate for invasive mediastinal nodal staging (IMNS), but the survival benefits of this approach in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without radiologic evidence of lymph node metastasis (rN0) remain uncertain. We aimed to investigate the impact of IMNS in patients with rN0 NSCLC by comparing the long-term survival between patients who underwent IMNS and those who did not (non-IMNS). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with NSCLC but without radiologic evidence of lymph node metastasis from the Registry for Thoracic Cancer Surgery and the clinical data warehouse at the Samsung Medical Centre, Republic of Korea between January 2, 2008 and December 31, 2016. We compared the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate as the primary outcome after propensity score matching between the IMNS and non-IMNS groups. The age, sex, performance statue, tumor size, centrality, solidity, lung function, FDG uptake in PET-CT, and histological examination of the tumor before surgery were matched. Findings: A total of 4545 patients (887 in the IMNS group and 3658 in the non-IMNS group) who received curative treatment for NSCLC were included in this study. By the mediastinal node dissection, the overall incidence of unforeseen mediastinal node metastasis (N2) was 7.2% (317/4378 patients). Despite the IMNS, 67% of pathological N2 was missed (61/91 patients with unforeseen N2). Based on propensity score matching, 866 patients each for the IMNS and non-IMNS groups were assigned. There was no significant difference in 5-year OS and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between two groups: 5-year OS was 73.9% (95% confidence interval, CI: 71%-77%) for IMNS and 71.7% (95% CI: 68.6%-74.9%; p = 0.23), for non-IMNS (hazard ratio, HR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.77-1.07), while 5-year RFS was 64.7% (95% CI: 61.5%-68.2%) and 67.5% (95% CI: 64.3%-70.9%; p = 0.35 (HR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.92-1.27), respectively. Moreover, the timing and locations of recurrence were similar in both groups. Interpretation: IMNS might not be required before surgery for patients with NSCLC without LN suspicious of metastasis. Further randomised trials are required to validate the findings of the present study. Funding: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.