Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38361989›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Long-term efficacy and safety of a treatment strategy for HIV infection using protease inhibitor monotherapy: 8-year routine clinical care follow-up from a randomised, controlled, open-label pragmatic trial (PIVOT).

Nicholas I Paton, Wolfgang Stöhr, Alejandro Arenas-Pinto, Amanda Clarke, Ian Williams, Margaret Johnson, Chloe Orkin, Fabian Chen, Vincent Lee, Alan Winston and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicholas I PatonMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Wolfgang StöhrMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Alejandro Arenas-PintoMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Amanda ClarkeUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
Ian WilliamsUniversity College London, UK.
Margaret JohnsonRoyal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Chloe OrkinBarts and the Royal London Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Fabian ChenRoyal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, UK.
Vincent LeeManchester Royal Infirmary, UK.
Alan WinstonSt Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Mark GompelsSouthmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Julie FoxGuys and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Karen SandersMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
David T DunnMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
Protease Inhibitor monotherapy Versus Ongoing Triple therapy (PIVOT) Trial Team
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBNational University of Singapore · SGSouthmead Hospital · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBManchester Royal Infirmary · GBRoyal London Hospital · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBRoyal Berkshire Hospital · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treatment-simplification strategies are important tools for patient-centred management. We evaluated long-term outcomes from a PI monotherapy switch strategy. Methods: Eligible participants attending 43 UK treatment centres had a viral load (VL) below 50 copies/ml for at least 24 weeks on combination ART. Participants were randomised to maintain ongoing triple therapy (OT) or switch to a strategy of physician-selected PI monotherapy (PI-mono) with prompt return to combination therapy if VL rebounded. The primary outcome, previously reported, was loss of future drug options after 3 years, defined as new intermediate/high level resistance to at least one drug to which the participant's virus was considered sensitive at trial entry. Here we report resistance and disease outcomes after further extended follow-up in routine care. The study was registered as ISRCTN04857074. Findings: We randomised 587 participants to OT (291) or PI-mono (296) between Nov 4, 2008, and July 28, 2010 and followed them for a median of more than 8 years (100 months) until 2018. At the end of this follow-up time, one or more future drug options had been lost in 7 participants in the OT group and 6 in the PI-mono group; estimated cumulative risk by 8 years of 2.7% and 2.1% respectively (difference -0.6%, 95% CI -3.2% to 2.0%). Only one PI-mono participant developed resistance to the protease inhibitor they were taking (atazanavir). Serious clinical events (death, serious AIDS, and serious non-AIDS) were infrequent; reported in a total of 12 (4.1%) participants in the OT group and 23 (7.8%) in the PI-mono group (P = 0.08) over the entire follow-up period. Interpretation: A strategy of PI monotherapy, with regular VL monitoring and prompt reintroduction of combination treatment following rebound, preserved future treatment options. Findings confirm the high genetic barrier to resistance of the PI drug class that makes them well suited for creative, patient-centred, treatment-simplification approaches. The possibility of a small excess risk of serious clinical events with the PI monotherapy strategy cannot be excluded. Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Indexed as

DarunavirHIVProtease inhibitor monotherapyRandomisedSimplification

Identifiers

PMID38361989
PMCPMC10867418
OpenAlexW4392066349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.