ArticleOphthalmology science
Development of a Semi-automated Computer-based Tool for the Quantification of Vascular Tortuosity in the Murine Retina.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterization of vascular tortuosity throughout the murine oxygen-induced retinopathy model of ischemic retinopathy.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Review of Retinopathy of Prematurity Management in the Anti-VEGF Era: Evolving Global Paradigms, Persistent Challenges and Our AI-Assisted Future.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The murine oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) model is one of the most widely used animal models of ischemic retinopathy, mimicking hallmark pathophysiology of initial vaso-obliteration (VO) resulting in ischemia that drives neovascularization (NV). In addition to NV and VO, human ischemic retinopathies, including retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), are characterized by increased vascular tortuosity. Vascular tortuosity is an indicator of disease severity, need to treat, and treatment response in ROP. Current literature investigating novel therapeutics in the OIR model often report their effects on NV and VO, and measurements of vascular tortuosity are less commonly performed. No standardized quantification of vascular tortuosity exists to date despite this metric's relevance to human disease. This proof-of-concept study aimed to apply a previously published semi-automated computer-based image analysis approach (iROP-Assist) to develop a new tool to quantify vascular tortuosity in mouse models. Design: Experimental study. Subjects: C57BL/6J mice subjected to the OIR model. Methods: In a pilot study, vasculature was manually segmented on flat-mount images of OIR and normoxic (NOX) mice retinas and segmentations were analyzed with iROP-Assist to quantify vascular tortuosity metrics. In a large cohort of age-matched (postnatal day 12 [P12], P17, P25) NOX and OIR mice retinas, NV, VO, and vascular tortuosity were quantified and compared. In a third experiment, vascular tortuosity in OIR mice retinas was quantified on P17 following intravitreal injection with anti-VEGF (aflibercept) or Immunoglobulin G isotype control on P12. Main Outcome Measures: Vascular tortuosity. Results: Cumulative tortuosity index was the best metric produced by iROP-Assist for discriminating between OIR mice and NOX controls. Increased vascular tortuosity correlated with disease activity in OIR. Treatment of OIR mice with aflibercept rescued vascular tortuosity. Conclusions: Vascular tortuosity is a quantifiable feature of the OIR model that correlates with disease severity and may be quickly and accurately quantified using the iROP-Assist algorithm. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.