Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38361813›Full record

ArticleVirus evolution2024

SARS-CoV-2 lineage assignments using phylogenetic placement/UShER are superior to pangoLEARN machine-learning method.

Adriano de Bernardi Schneider, Michelle Su, Angie S Hinrichs, Jade Wang, Helly Amin, John Bell, Debra A Wadford, Áine O'Toole, Emily Scher, Marc D Perry and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virus evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Real-time, multi-pathogen wastewater genomic surveillance with Freyja 2.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Adriano de Bernardi SchneiderGenomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7487-266X
Michelle SuDepartment of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City Public Health Laboratory, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Angie S HinrichsGenomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1697-1130
Jade WangDepartment of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City Public Health Laboratory, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Helly AminDepartment of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City Public Health Laboratory, New York, NY 10016, USA.
John BellCalifornia Department of Public Health (CDPH), VRDL/COVIDNet, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
Debra A WadfordCalifornia Department of Public Health (CDPH), VRDL/COVIDNet, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
Áine O'TooleInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8083-474X
Emily ScherInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK.
Marc D PerryGenomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Yatish TurakhiaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5600-2900
Nicola De MaioEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1776-8564
Scott HughesDepartment of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City Public Health Laboratory, New York, NY 10016, USA.
Russ Corbett-DetigGenomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid spread and evolution of SARS-CoV-2, the ability to monitor its transmission and distinguish among viral lineages is critical for pandemic response efforts. The most commonly used software for the lineage assignment of newly isolated SARS-CoV-2 genomes is pangolin, which offers two methods of assignment, pangoLEARN and pUShER. PangoLEARN rapidly assigns lineages using a machine-learning algorithm, while pUShER performs a phylogenetic placement to identify the lineage corresponding to a newly sequenced genome. In a preliminary study, we observed that pangoLEARN (decision tree model), while substantially faster than pUShER, offered less consistency across different versions of pangolin v3. Here, we expand upon this analysis to include v3 and v4 of pangolin, which moved the default algorithm for lineage assignment from pangoLEARN in v3 to pUShER in v4, and perform a thorough analysis confirming that pUShER is not only more stable across versions but also more accurate. Our findings suggest that future lineage assignment algorithms for various pathogens should consider the value of phylogenetic placement.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsCOVID-19Phylogeneticsvariants

Identifiers

PMID38361813
PMCPMC10868549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.