ArticleHealth science reports2024
Safety of pregnancy after cerebral venous thrombosis: A case-control study.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Since pregnancy is considered one of the major risk factors of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), the safety of pregnancy in women of childbearing age and a previous history of CVT, is concerning in terms of prevention, family planning, and management. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of pregnancies among women of childbearing age with previous CVT, evaluate the pregnancy-associated risk of CVT recurrence, and explore the maternal and fetal outcomes among CVT women in comparison with pregnant women without a history of CVT. Methods: A retrospective, case-control study was conducted at the Obstetrics Departments of King Fahad Medical City Hospital, Saudi Arabia. It included all women with a history of CVT diagnosed in the last 5 years (cases), as well as CVT history-free pregnant women (control). The prevalence of pregnancy after CVT was estimated and the prepartum and postpartum parameters of the two groups were compared. Results: Fifty women with CVT and 100 controls were included. Among the 50 CVT cases, 28 (56.0%) have been pregnant. The incidence of pre-eclampsia was significantly more frequent in CVT women (7.1% vs. 0.0%, Conclusion: More than half of women of childbearing age with a history of CVT opt for pregnancy after the CVT episode, with no major additional risk for pre or postpartum complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.