ArticleCureus2024
Assessment of Psychological Implications and Quality of Life After Different Cardiac Device Implantation in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac device therapy is likely to affect different aspects of patients' psychological well-being, such as their quality of life. The aim of this study was to examine the mental health status, specifically the conditions of depression and anxiety regarding implantable cardiac device patients.
methodsA cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted in January 2022. This study was conducted at King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. All patients aged more than 18 years old who underwent heart device implantation for six months or more formed the study population. A total of 30 implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) subtypes were used in our patients (45.8%), including cardiac resynchronization therapy device (CRT-D) in seven patients (14.6%) and one subcutaneous ICD (2.1%). A pacemaker was used in 18 patients (37.5%). Binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the association between type of cardiac implantation device and the likelihood of having abnormal depression and anxiety score.
resultsA total of 48 patients participated in this study. Hypertension was the most frequently associated risk factor in our sample (64.6%; n=31). In comparison between ICD users and pacemaker users in terms of the SF-36 general health survey, a marginally significant difference was noted in the role of limitations due to emotional health (63 ± 28.6) for ICD patients compared to pacemaker patients (81.8 ± 28.1), (p=0.050). However, pacemaker patients showed a significant favourable social functioning score (90.1 ± 17.7) compared to ICD patients (71.5 ± 19), (p=0.001). There is no significant difference noted regarding the other domains. Binary logistic regression analysis identified that patients who are using ICD were seven times more likely to have abnormal anxiety score (odds ratio: 7.00 (95% confidence interval: 1.36-35.9) (p=0.020).
conclusionThis study identified a potential association between cardiac devices and the anxiety and quality of life of patients. Nonetheless, further investigation is warranted to assess the psychological and physiological effects of cardiac device therapy on patients, in addition to examining the effects of implantation and follow-up on cardiac function and cardiac symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.