ArticleCureus2024
Evaluation of Scissor Glide Characteristics Through Surgeons' Subjective Assessment: The Application of Nitriding in Scissor Hardening Tests.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn robotic surgery, studies on providing tactile feedback to users are ongoing. However, the accuracy of the subjective sensations of surgeons, as users, has been largely unassessed. This study aimed to assess the validity of surgeons' subjective evaluations of scissors resistance through interindividual, inter-surgeon, and objective evaluations. Furthermore, in this study, we explored the possibility of using nitriding to increase the hardness of the scissors and assessed changes in subjective resistance values before and after nitriding using this approach.
methodFive surgeons conducted validation of five curved surgical scissors (145 mm; Arakawa Seisakujyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and assessed their subjective resistance using a scale from 0 to 10, where a rating of 10 signified significant resistance impeding the scissors' closure. The temporal changes in subjective resistance values, from maximum open to close, were graphically recorded. To demonstrate the reproducibility of subjective resistance values, the subjective resistance values of the same control scissors were measured at intervals of at least two weeks, and the correlation coefficient was calculated. To analyze the closing characteristics of subjective resistance values between different pairs of scissors, the effect of scissor type and scissor closure position was compared as two independent variables using a two-factor analysis of variance. A comparative evaluation was conducted to assess the frictional properties of scissors after nitriding, comparing the subjective assessment by surgeons with the objective assessment using a digital force gauge.
resultsThe correlation coefficient of subjective resistance values measured by surgeons demonstrated a high reproducibility of 0.746. A two-factor analysis of variance conducted on subjective resistance values demonstrated the presence of a primary effect for the sample factor (scissors), as well as for the position factor (closing process), with the additional observation of the interaction between these two factors. The results from the two-factor analysis of variance above provide evidence supporting the validity of the subjective resistance measurements. There was a significant increase in subjective resistance after the nitriding process. The graph of subjective resistance values and objective resistance values showed similarity.
conclusionsThe surgeons' subjective assessment of scissors resistance showed high reproducibility and validity, as evidenced by distinguishable differences in scissor movement interactions and pre- and post-nitriding resistance. Further studies are warranted to expand on these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.