ArticleiScience2024
Effect size of delayed freezing, diurnal variation, and hindgut location on the mouse fecal microbiome.
Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Practical considerations in fecal sample collection for microbiome research include time to sample storage, time of collection, and hindgut position during terminal collections. Here, parallel experiments were performed to investigate the relative effect of these factors on microbiome composition in mice colonized with two different vendor-origin microbiomes. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of immediately flash-frozen feces showed no difference in alpha or beta diversity compared to samples incubated up to 9 h at room temperature. Samples collected in the morning showed greater alpha diversity compared to samples collected in the afternoon. While a significant effect of time was detected in all hindgut regions, the effect increased from cecum to distal colon. This study highlights common scenarios in microbiome research that may affect outcome measures of microbial community analysis. However, we demonstrate a relatively low effect size of these technical factors when compared to a primary experimental factor with large intergroup variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.